CTRI/2020/03/024014
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
A randomized comparative study of combined spinal epidural and epidural analgesia in labour versus intravenous labour analgesia
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be Universty0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery
- Sponsor
- Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be Universty
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA physical status 1\&2\.
- •Parturients with singleton pregnancy aged 21\-35 years,at gestational maturity of 37\-41 weeks with cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labour.
- •Active phase of labour with cervical dilatation of 4cms and 50% effacement.
- •On admission Non Stress Test\-\-Reactive.
- •No identifiable medical or obstetric complication present.
- •No clinical evidence of cephalopelvic disproportion
Exclusion Criteria
- •High risk cases like antepartum haemorrhage,preeclampsia,diabetes complicating pregnancy,polyhydramnious,oligohydramnious,cephalopelvic disproportion,malpresentation and prelabour rupture of membranes.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison between combined Spinal Epidural and Spinal Anaesthesia in elderly patients in lower abdominal surgeryCTRI/2020/09/028096Department of Anaesthesiology
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
comparative study of effect of combined spinal epidural anaesthesia on vital parameters of mother and baby in sitting versus lateral position posted for elective cesarean sectioCTRI/2023/05/053325OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL MIDNAPORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITA
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomised controlled trial comparing the spinal sensory level achieved, duration of action and safety of generic (Bupivacaine 0.5% with Dextrose-PharmaQ) versus original bupivacaine (Macaine 0.5% with dextrose-Adcock Ingram) in spinal anaesthesiaPACTR201807735986564Pireshin Ramdharee72
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomized study comparing spinal anealgesia compared with epidural analgesia durinmg and postoperative nephrectomy dua to renal cell carcinomaPostoperative pain and mobilization after radical or nephronsparing nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinomaMedDRA version: 13.1Level: LLTClassification code 10036236Term: Postoperative pain reliefSystem Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical proceduresTherapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]EUCTR2008-001491-77-SEProf. Ola Winsö, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Norrlands University Hospiatal
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
To compare combination of general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia with general anaesthesia only in patients undergoing laproscopic gynaecological proceduresHealth Condition 1: O94- Sequelae of complication of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperiumCTRI/2024/06/069636Pragya pramanik