Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02058511
NCT02058511
Terminated
Not Applicable

Intraoperative Use of Infrared Pupillometry During General Anesthesia to Predict Pain and Quality of Regional Anesthesia After Surgery

University of California, San Francisco1 site in 1 country24 target enrollmentNovember 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance
Conditions
Postoperative Pain
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Enrollment
24
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain in Recovery Room
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study comprises of a series of pupillary measurements using infrared pupillometry in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery of any type.

Infrared pupillometry will be used to assess whether a painful stimulus results in pupillary reflex dilation (PRD). The extend of the PRD may be an indicator how painful a stimulus is. This may help to predict the amount of discomfort a patient will be experiencing after emergence from general anesthesia.

In addition to measuring the pupillary reflex dilation, we will also measure oscillations of pupil size before and after indiction of anesthesia, as well as during recovery. These spontaneously occuring oscillations in pupil size, also called hippus, appear to be sensitive to anesthetics and opioids. However, the effect of these drugs on hippus has not been systematically addressed.

The aim of the study is

  1. to identify whether regional anesthesia techniques such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks will block the PRD. This would allow assessment of block success in the anesthetized patient.
  2. to correlate the extent of the pupillary reflex dilation and hippus in the anesthetized patient during and at the end of surgery with early postoperative pain scores and subsequent analgesia requirements. Such correlation would allow to predict the amount of postoperative pain before the patients emerge from general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

The planned study is a prospective cohort study. Patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery of any type (debridements, repair of anterior (ACL) or posterior cruciform ligaments (PCL), meniscectomies, medial (MCL) or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) repair, as well as microfracture surgery will be enrolled. During anesthesia, infrared pupillometry will be used to assess whether a painful stimulus results in pupillary reflex dilation (PRD). The extend of the PRD may be an indicator how painful a stimulus is. The PRD is measurable under general anesthesia in spite of the fact that the patient does not "feel" or experience the painful stimulus. The aim of the study is 1. to identify whether regional anesthesia techniques such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks (performed before the start of anesthesia) will block the PRD evoked by a painful stimulus such electrical stimulation before procedure start. This would allow assessment of block success in the anesthetized patient. 2. to correlate the extent of the pupillary reflex dilation and hippus in the anesthetized patient during and at the end of surgery with early postoperative pain scores and subsequent analgesia requirements. Such correlation would allow to predict the amount of postoperative pain before the patients emerge from general anesthesia. Knee arthroscopies are routinely performed under general anesthesia with or without regional anesthesia, depending on the anticipated extent of surgery and the preferences of the anesthesiologist and surgeon. The assessment of the PRD and/or hipppus before emergence would identify those patients who would benefit from an additional nerve block before emergence to achieve better pain control immediately postoperatively and to reduce the demand for postoperative analgesics. The planned investigation tries to achieve two novel findings. First, the measurement of the PRD at the start of surgery will demonstrate whether a nerve block successfully blocks the initial surgical stimulus. There is currently no method available that can assess block success in the anesthetized patient. Secondly, the measurement at the end of the surgery tries to predict the amount of pain following emergence from surgery. Pain may be experienced by patients without nerve blocks as well as with nerve blocks, as the latter may have failed or incomplete blocks, or may had a more extensive procedure that cannot be completely covered by the block administered preoperatively. Identifying these patients may allow treatment to minimize discomfort following emergence. Pupillary reflex dilation describes the dilation of the pupil following a painful stimulus. The dilation last several seconds. Pupillometry using an infrared pupillometer allows the quantification of the reflex dilation. The PRD can be given a numerical value that reflects the extent of the dilation. A recently published study demonstrated the correlation of the extend of the PRD with pain scores and opioid requirements postoperatively. However, this study was done in awake patients following surgery. The aim of this study is to predict analgesia requirements in patients still under general anesthesia, before they experience postoperative pain. We expect that infrared pupillometry during general anesthesia can predict pain following surgery. Once this has been established, this knowledge and its application would allow the anesthesiologist to initiate pain-relieving interventions such as additional nerve blocks or administration of analgesics before emergence of the patients from general anesthesia. In addition to measuring the pupillary reflex dilation, we will also measure oscillations of pupil size before and after induction of anesthesia, as well as during recovery. These spontaneously occurring oscillations in pupil size, also called hippus, appear to be sensitive to anesthetics and opioids. However, the effect of these drugs on hippus has not been systematically addressed.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2012
End Date
November 2016
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Matthias Behrends

Associate Clinical Professor

University of California, San Francisco

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients older than 18 years undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery of any type

Exclusion Criteria

  • Blindness
  • Anisocoria
  • History of opioid abuse
  • Chronic pain patients
  • Gastric Reflux Disease (due to the use of laryngeal masks in the study)
  • Non english speaking patients
  • Cognitive impairment

Arms & Interventions

Intervention Group

all enrolled patients undergo the same protocol/ treatment: Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance Pupillometry after administration of anesthetic drugs

Intervention: Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance

Intervention Group

all enrolled patients undergo the same protocol/ treatment: Anesthesia Premedication, Induction and Maintenance Pupillometry after administration of anesthetic drugs

Intervention: Pupillometry after administration of anesthetic drugs

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain in Recovery Room

Time Frame: at arrival in recovery room

Pain as assessed by visual analogue score at arrival of the patient in the recovery room Scale goes from 0-10, with 10 indicating the worst pain possible

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of Patients we Were Able to Elicit a PLR Under Stable Experimental Conditions(measurements were taken at two time points during surgery. Each measurement took 30 seconds)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials