A Cognitive Bias Modification RCT for Aggression
- Conditions
- Intermittent Explosive Disorder
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Cognitive Bias ModificationBehavioral: Cognitive Bias Control
- Registration Number
- NCT04819230
- Lead Sponsor
- Temple University
- Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will test a computerized cognitive bias modification program (CBM) to treat attention and interpretive biases in patients with primary aggression.
- Detailed Description
The objective of the proposed study is to test a computerized cognitive bias modification program (CBM) to treat attention and interpretive biases in patients with Intermittent Explosive Disorder, a disorder characterized by habitual engagement in aggressive behavior. Efficacy of the CBM program will be assessed via a small randomized controlled trial comparing CBM to a computerized control condition. This training program would consist of a four-week regimen of twice-weekly 30-minute sessions (8 sessions total) during which individuals would learn to: (a) focus attention away from threatening words toward neutral words \[attention bias\], and (b) to disambiguate ambiguous interpersonal scenarios using more benign, rather than threatening, interpretations \[interpretive bias\]. Participants will be asked to complete behavioral measures of attention bias and interpretive bias, as well as self-report measures of anger / aggression, interpretive bias, emotion regulation and life satisfaction at baseline (pre-training), post-training, and 1-month follow-up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 45
- Meet DSM-5 criteria for current IED, as assessed via phone screen and confirmed during an in-person diagnostic interview conducted during visit one of the study
- Are able and willing to cooperate with study protocol; i.e. keep appointments, read and understand consent form, etc.
- Have written and verbal English proficiency for understanding consent and study materials
- Have a lifetime history of psychosis
- Have current moderate to severe substance use disorder
- Have a history of bipolar disorder
- Have current major depressive disorder
- Are younger than 18 or older than 55 years old
- Are currently (past month) receiving treatment for anger or aggression
- Recently (past month) started or changed psychotropic medications
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Bias Modification Cognitive Bias Modification Attention (ATT) and interpretation (ITT) bias training. Participants complete the ATT and ITT tasks twice per week for four weeks. The ATT trains attention toward neutral stimuli and away from negative stimuli. On trials with one neutral and one threat word, the probe will always follow the location of the neutral word. Therefore, there is a contingency between the valence of the word and the location of the probe. Participants will be asked to indicate which type of probe had appeared in each trial by pressing a corresponding button as rapidly and accurately as possible. The ITT trains participants to make benign (vs. threatening) interpretations of socially-ambiguous scenarios. For each trial, a word suggesting a socially threatening or benign interpretation is presented then replaced by a sentence describing a socially-ambiguous scenario. Participants indicate if they thought the word and sentence were related. Participants will receive corrective feedback after each trial. Control Condition Cognitive Bias Control A combination of attention (ATT-C) and interpretation (ITT-C) control tasks These tasks are identical to the experimental tasks (ATT and ITT) with the exceptions that: ATT-C: It is designed to train attention toward neither neutral nor the threat stimuli. This will be achieved by having an equal number of probes follow the location of the threatening word and the neutral word. ITT-C: It is not designed to train benign interpretations of ambiguous social scenarios. Thus, no feedback will be given during the inter-trial interval, rather participants will see a blank screen between trials. Participants will complete both the ATT-C and ITT-C tasks twice per week for four weeks, totaling to eight experimental sessions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in a Aggression from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up preatment, post-treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months Overt Aggression Scale-Modified (higher score means more aggression)
Change in a Anger from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2:state anger scale modified(higher score means more anger)
Change in Social Information Processing from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months Social Information Processing - Attribution and Emotional Response Questionnaire
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Emotion Regulation from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (higher score means greater emotion dysregulation)
Change in IED diagnosis from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months Intermittent Explosive Disorder-Module (presence vs absence of current disorder)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Temple University
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States