Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05031936
NCT05031936
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Intravascular Injection Rates During Cervical and Lumbar Medial Branch Block Using Touhy or Quincke Type Needle

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center1 site in 1 country67 target enrollmentAugust 12, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Vascular Complications
Sponsor
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Enrollment
67
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
incidence of intravascular injection
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare using Toughy needle has an advantage of reducing intravascular injection rates during cervical medial branch block.

Detailed Description

In previous reports, the use of Toughy needle was thought to reduce the incidence of intravascular injection as low as 2.9% during lumbar transforaminal injection. Blunt needles with a pencil point tip, such as Whitacre needles, are not as sharp at their tip as are Quincke needles, which have bevels. Toughy or blunt needles may therefore be less likely to penetrate a vessel during a procedure. Hence, we postulated the incidence of intravenous uptake would be significantly lower using a Toughy needle than using a Quincke needle for lumbar medial branch block. To confirm the intravascular injection rates, we used the real time fluoroscopy after injection of contrast medium. The goal of this study was to compare the incidence of intravascular injection rate betweeen Toughy and Quincke needles using real time fluoroscopy during cervical medial branch block

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 12, 2021
End Date
October 30, 2022
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ji Hee Hong

Professor

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • facet joint arthropathy

Exclusion Criteria

  • allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium
  • pregnancy
  • spine deformity
  • neurologic abnormality

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

incidence of intravascular injection

Time Frame: 1 minute after finishing cervical medial branch block

incidence of intravascular injection during cervical medial branch block

Secondary Outcomes

  • radiation amout to complete cervical medial branch block(Baseline, 1 second after the completion of cervical medial branch block)
  • time required to complete cervical medial branch block(Baseline, 1 second after the completion of cervical medial branch block)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials