The Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation rTMS on Hand Muscles in Chronic Stroke Patients.
- Conditions
- StrokeStroke PatientsArm Weakness as a Consequence of StrokeBrain StimulationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation RepetitiveTranscranial Magnetic StimulationMotor LearningChronic Stroke PatientsChronic Stroke Survivors
- Registration Number
- NCT06765642
- Lead Sponsor
- Duke University
- Brief Summary
The study is about using a brain stimulation technique called rTMS (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) to help improve hand muscles in people who had a stroke. Researchers want to understand how this device can help stroke patients use their hands better.
- Detailed Description
The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of a high-dose of a excitatory-specific patterned Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (i.e., intermittent theta-burst stimulation - iTBS) protocol as a neuromodulatory tool on the neuromotor recovery (corticospinal excitability and motor performance) in individuals with chronic stroke using either the conventional iTBS protocol (600 pulses; iTBS600) or a high dose iTBS protocols (a total of 2400 pulses) over a single spot (Focal iTBS; FiTBS2400) and 4 spots (Diffuse iTBS: DiTBS2400) on the ipsilesional hemisphere. The use of this approach aims to potentially maximize motor recovery in chronic stroke by harnessing corticospinal plasticity and modulating motor learning behavior.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 26
- Age >=21 years old of any race or gender
- First-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (neuroimaging verified) at least 6 months from stroke onset
- Unilateral arm weakness measured by FM-UM scale <= 62/64
- Inducible rest motor threshold and testing motor threshold recorded from the affected first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle from the study subject
-
Bilateral strokes (infarcts and/or hematoma)
-
Other co-existent neuromuscular disorders affecting upper extremity motor impairment.
-
History of medically uncontrolled depression or other neuropsychiatric disorders despite medications either before or after a stroke that may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study.
-
History of confirmed dementia or taking the following dementia drugs, such as Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine, Memantine, Aducanumab, Lecanemab, Donanemab that affecting their ability to follow study procedure.
-
Uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment(s) at the time of randomization, defined as SBP≥185 mmHg or DBP≥110 mmHg (patient can be treated, reassessed and randomized later).
-
Presence of any MRI/rTMS risk factors including but not limited to:
- an electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated metallic or nonmetallic implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system.
- a non-fixed metallic part in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to the eye.
- history of seizure disorder before stroke or seizure after stroke.
- preexisting scalp lesion or bone defect or hemicraniectomy.
-
Concurrent enrollment in another interventional stroke recovery study. 7. Concerns that the subject cannot comply with study procedures and visits. 8. Pregnant individuals.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine whether there is overall stimulation effect among three stimulation paradigms (FiTBS600; FiTBS2400; DiTBS2400) on the ipsilesional corticospinal excitability of a hand muscle. Baseline, prior to and after intervention (Pre0 and Pre1; 45 minutes apart) Each intervention session (total of 3) will consist of one format of iTBS stimulation. Before and after the intervention, single pulse TMS (spTMS) and motor sequence learning (MSL) will be used to assess the effect of the intervention on corticospinal excitability and motor performance.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Duke University Medical Center
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States