Soft Drink Straw as an Alternative Device of Creating Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) in Thoracic Surgery Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 13
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Comparison by Commands A and B
研究概览
简要总结
Is there any possibility that patients who undergone thoracic surgery could use a simple soft drink straw as an alternative PEP device? The present study was performed to test the suitability and effect of a soft drink straw as an alternative Positive Expiratory Pressure device in patients undergone thoracic surgery and includes two sub-exploratory areas.
Before and after the measurements, the volunteers' saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, dyspnea, thoracotomy pain and Cough Peak Expiratory Flow was measured.
The first part of the research, that refers to the most appropriate command for exhalation from a straw of a certain inner diameter (5mm), was carried out by using a device consisted of drinking straw, disposable mouthpiece and manometer, which valued the developed pressures during the exhalation attempts. Patients did not have visual contact with the manometer. The effectiveness of two commands (Command A: "blow continuously so that you feel little resistance during exhalation" and Command B: "blow continuously so that you feel moderate resistance during exhalation") was estimated by comparing the average of the developing pressures for every command, that occur during exhalation, with the therapeutic range of pressure. This part of the study was a cross-sectional transition and every volunteer performed 3 attempts, for each command.
The second part of the research was conducted for the evaluation of the benefits of the use of a drinking straw as an alternative device. A number of n = 8 volunteers (intervention group), who were selected from the overall sample using the closed envelope method. Taking into account the results of the first part of the research, the respondents were asked to exhale as indicated by the command that was selected before, performing 3 sets of 10 repetitions, that included short breaks between sets. The remaining volunteers (n = 5) consisted the control group.
Finally, all patients were re-examined in order to measure the Cough Peak Expiratory Flow , dyspnea, pain, saturation, heart and respiratory rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, after the intervention.
详细描述
INTRODUCTION
The use of positive expiratory pressure devices is considered beneficial in patients who have undergone abdominal and thoracic surgery with an impact on blood gas measurement values, the hospitalization length, the use of antibiotics and the pathology of the chest. Of course, there are researchers who doubt the effectiveness of the method, mainly due to the fact that it does not possibly reduce the risk of atelectasis, especially in patients who undergone cardiac surgery. However, the method is very popular in physiotherapy, and the use of alternative devices that create positive expiratory pressure, such as water bottles or gloves, is suggested, especially in cases when the access to the classic devices is not easy, mainly during the periods of crisis.
Coughing is a process that ensures the cleaning and protection of the airways. The outcome of the thoracic surgery may often depend on the quality of the patient's cough postoperatively which may put the patient at risk that could last for up to eight weeks. The effectiveness of the cough can be assessed by measuring the peak cough flow using a peak flow meter, method that many researchers in Europe and America prefer. Cough with a maximum expiratory flow over 160 L/min could ensure a safe extubation or decannulation of severely ill and postoperative patients. Therefore, if there was a way leading to cough enhancement, this could be a lifeline to the recovery of these type of patients.
PURPOSE
The present study was performed to test the suitability and effect of a soft drink straw as an alternative positive expiratory pressure device in patients undergone thoracic surgery and includes two sub-exploratory areas.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Sequential
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •adult patients undergone thoracic surgery
- •no limit of age
- •mesosternal or lateral incision
- •hemodynamically stable
- •supplied with an O2 mixture of below 50%
- •full-conscious
- •systolic pressure below 150 cmH20
- •2nd and 3rd postoperative day.
排除标准
- •history of chronic respiratory disease with severe symptoms
- •tendency to vomit
- •cardiac arrhythmia due to atrial fibrillation postoperatively
- •decrease in saturation ≤90
- •dizziness
- •palpitations
结局指标
主要结局
Comparison by Commands A and B
时间窗: 15 minutes
Comparison of the outcoming pressures by Commands A and B
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Anna Grigoriadou
Physiotherapist
University of Thessaly
