MedPath

Platform Study of Novel Ruxolitinib Combinations in Myelofibrosis Patients

Registration Number
NCT04097821
Lead Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of combination treatment of ruxolitinib with 5 novel compounds: siremadlin, crizanlizumab, sabatolimab, rineterkib and NIS793 in myelofibrosis (MF) subjects.

Detailed Description

This open-label, multi-center, Phase Ib/II platform study design consisted of 3 parts. Part 1 was a Phase Ib dose escalation and safety run-in for the 5 novel agents in combination with ruxolitinib to assess safety, tolerability and to confirm a recommended Phase II dose. Dose escalation cohorts were treated with ruxoltinib + siremadlin or ruxolitinib + rineterkib. Safety run-in cohorts were treated with either ruxolitinb + sabatolimab, ruxolitinb + crizanlizumab or ruxolitinib + NIS7913.

Parts 2 and 3 were Phase II selection and expansion, respectively, to assess preliminary efficacy of the combination treatments from Part 1 that were evaluated as safe and tolerable. The number of combination treatment arms opening in Part 2 depended on the results of Part 1. In Part 2, an interim analysis was planned to determine if combination treatment(s) could be expanded in Part 3.

In June 2022, Novartis decided to permanently halt the study enrollment in all ongoing parts (Part 1 and Part 2), and Part 3 (expansion) was not initiated. With Protocol Amendment 8, an extension treatment phase of 12 cycles was added in Part 1 to allow access to the combination treatment for ongoing subjects deriving clinical benefit. In consideration of the enrollment halt, Parts 2 and 3 objectives were not pursued, and Part 1 objectives were updated accordingly.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects have diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, or diagnosis of post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera (PV) myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) 2007 criteria
  • Palpable spleen of at least 5 cm from the left costal margin (LCM) to the point of greatest splenic protrusion or enlarged spleen volume of at least 450 cm3 per MRI or CT scan at baseline (a MRI/CT scan up to 8 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment can be accepted).
  • Have been treated with ruxolitinib for at least 12 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment
  • Are stable (no dose adjustments) on the prescribed ruxolitinib dose (between 5 and 25 mg twice a day (BID)) for ≥ 4 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment

Extension treatment phase inclusion criteria:

  • Signed consent for the extension treatment phase
  • ongoing in the core treatment phase
  • demonstrates clinical benefit of treatment in core treatment phase per investigator's assessment.

Core treatment phase

Exclusion Criteria
  • Not able to understand and to comply with study instructions and requirements.
  • Received any investigational agent for the treatment of MF (except ruxolitinib) within 30 days of first dose of study treatment or within 5 half-lives of the study treatment, whichever is greater
  • Peripheral blood blasts count of > 10%.
  • has documented severe hypersensitivity reactions/immunogenicity (IG) to a prior biologic product or Received a monoclonal antibody (Ab) or immunoglobulin-based agent within 1 year of screening in NIS793, crizanlizumab or sabatolimab arms, or in rineterkib or siremadlin arms within <=4 weeks of screening or <=5 half-lives whichever is shorter
  • Splenic irradiation within 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Received blood platelet transfusion within 28 days prior to first dose of study treatment.

Extension treatment phase Exclusion Criteria:

  • meets any of study treatment discontinuation criteria
  • current evidence of treatment failure per investigator, following treatment in core treatment phase
  • enrolled in another interventional study
  • evidence of non-compliance to study procedures or withdrew consent in core treatment phase
  • currently has unresolved toxicities for which study treatment has been interrupted in the core treatment phase
  • local access to alternative myelofibrosis treatment including those currently under investigation in clinical trials as assessed suitable in the opinion of the investigator.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Siremadlin 20 mgRuxolitinibDose escalation of siremadlin added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Siremadlin 20 mgSiremadlinDose escalation of siremadlin added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Siremadlin 30 mgRuxolitinibDose escalation of siremadlin added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Siremadlin 30 mgSiremadlinDose escalation of siremadlin added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + CrizanlizumabCrizanlizumabSafety run-in of crizanlizumab added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Siremadlin 40 mgRuxolitinibDose escalation of siremadlin added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Siremadlin 40 mgSiremadlinDose escalation of siremadlin added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Rineterkib 200 mgRuxolitinibDose escalation of rineterkib added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + SabatolimabRuxolitinibSafety run-in of sabatolimab added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + Rineterkib 200 mgRineterkibDose escalation of rineterkib added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + CrizanlizumabRuxolitinibSafety run-in of crizanlizumab added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + SabatolimabSabatolimabSafety run-in of sabatolimab added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + NIS793RuxolitinibSafety run-in of NIS793 added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 1: Ruxolitinib + NIS793NIS793Safety run-in of NIS793 added to existing stable dose of ruxolitinib
Part 2: RuxolitinibRuxolitinibExisting stable dose of ruxolitinib as control for Part 2
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence and Severity of Dose Limiting Toxicities Within the First 2 Cycles in Part 1Baseline to the end of Cycle 2 (6 or 8 weeks)

Incidence and severity of dose limiting toxicities within the first 2 cycles (6 or 8 weeks) in Part 1 of the study. DLTs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria Version 5.0. Grade 0 was assigned for all non-missing values not graded as 1 or higher. Higher grade indicated more severity. Grade 5 was not used.

Response Rate at the End of Cycle 6 or Cycle 8 in Part 1Baseline to the end of Cycle 6 or 8 (24 weeks)

Composite of anemia improvement (hemoglobin level) and no spleen volume progression and no symptom worsening in Part 2 and Part 3 of the study. For a subject to be considered a responder, all three components of the composite had to be fulfilled.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Improvement in Hemoglobin Level of ≥ 1.5 g/dL From Baseline in Part 1Week 24, Week 48
Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Improvement in Hemoglobin Level of at Least >= 2.0 g/dL From Baseline in Part 1Week 24, Week 48
Change in Spleen Length From Baseline in Part 1Baseline, Week 24, Week 48

Change in spleen length measured in centimeters by manual palpation.

Percentage of Subjects With >=35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline in Part 1Week 24, Week 48

Change in spleen volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) from baseline.

Percentage of Subjects With >=25% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline in Part 1Week 24, Week 48

Change in spleen volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) from baseline.

Percentage of Subjects in Part 1 With >=50% Reduction From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form, Version 4.0 (MFSAF v4.0)Week 12, Week 24, Week 48

The MFSAF v4.0 questionnaire focuses on the 7 core symptoms of MF: fatigue, night sweats, pruritus, abdominal discomfort, pain under the ribs on the left side, early satiety and bone pain. Subjects record symptom severity at it worst for each of the 7 symptoms on an 11-point numeric rating scale, from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The Total Symptom Score (TSS) is the sum of all the scores for all 7 symptoms.

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) for Siremadlin, Rineterkib, Crizanlizumab, Sabatolimab, and NIS793 in Part 1Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 1 and 2 for siremadlin and Cycles 1 and 3 for crizanlizumab, sabatolimab, and NIS793; Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 for rineterkib
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) for Ruxolitinib in Part 1Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 1 and 2; Day 15 of Cycle 1
Maximum (Peak) Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Siremadlin, Rineterkib, Crizanlizumab, Sabatolimab, and NIS793 in Part 1Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 1 and 2 for siremadlin and Cycles 1 and 3 for crizanlizumab, sabatolimab, and NIS793; Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 for rineterkib
Maximum (Peak) Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Ruxolitinib in Part 1Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 1 and 2; Day 15 of Cycle 1
Time to Reach Maximum (Peak) Plasma, Blood, Serum or Other Body Fluid Drug Concentration After Single Dose Administration (Tmax) for Siremadlin, Rineterkib, Crizanlizumab, Sabatolimab, and NIS793 in Part 1Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 1 and 2 for siremadlin and Cycles 1 and 3 for crizanlizumab, sabatolimab, and NIS793; Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 for rineterkib
Time to Reach Maximum (Peak) Plasma, Blood, Serum or Other Body Fluid Drug Concentration After Single Dose Administration (Tmax) for Ruxolitinib in Part 1Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 1 and 2; Day 15 of Cycle 1
Concentration Versus Time Profile for Siremadlin in Part 1Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Day 6 of Cycle 1; Days 2 and 5 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Each cycle was 28 days.
Concentration Versus Time Profile for Rineterkib in Part 1Days 1, 2, 15, and 16 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Each cycle was 28 days.
Concentration Versus Time Profile for Crizanlizumab in Part 1Days 1, 2, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3; Day 1 of Cycles 4, 5, 6, and 9. Each cycle was 28 days.

EOI = end of infusion

Concentration Versus Time Profile for Sabatolimab in Part 1Days 1, 2, 8, and 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3; Day 1 of Cycles 4 and 5. Each cycle was 28 days.

EOI = end of infusion

Concentration Versus Time Profile for NIS793 in Part 1Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, and 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3; Day 1 of Cycles 4 and 5. Each cycle was 28 days.

EOI = end of infusion

Concentration Versus Time Profile for Ruxolitinib in Part 1Days 1, 2, 5, 6, and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2; Day 16 of Cycle 1; Days 1, 2, and 15 of Cycle 3; Days 1 and 5 of Cycles 4, 5, and 6. Each cycle was 28 days.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Novartis Investigative Site

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

Novartis Investigative Site
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.