MedPath

Neurocognitive Effectiveness in Treatment of First-episode Non-affective Psychosis: 1-year Follow-up

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Psychotic Disorders
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02534363
Lead Sponsor
Fundación Marques de Valdecilla
Brief Summary

Cognitive enhancement is a primary goal in treating individuals with schizophrenia. Cognitive deficits are already present at the first break of the illness, seem to remain stable during early phases and noticeably influence daily functioning. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of cognitive effectiveness have turned out to be a topic of increasing research interest. The initially postulated superior neurocognitive effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) compared to first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) is currently under debate. Long-term studies would be of great value to evaluate the differential benefits exerted by antipsychotic drugs on cognitive performance. The aim of this study is to investigate the cognitive effects of aripiprazole, quetiapine and ziprasidone in first-episode psychosis at 1 year.

Detailed Description

Study setting and financial support: data for the present investigation were obtained from an ongoing epidemiological and three-year longitudinal intervention program of first-episode psychosis (PAFIP) conducted at the outpatient clinic and the inpatient unit at the University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Spain. Conforming to international standards for research ethics, this program was approved by the local institutional review board. Patients meeting inclusion criteria and their families provided written informed consent to be included in the PAFIP. The Mental Health Services of Cantabria provided funding for implementing the program. No pharmaceutical company supplied any financial support.

Study design: this is a prospective, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label study. Investigators used a simple randomization procedure: a computer-generated randomization list was drawn up by a statistician. Dose ranges were 5-30 mg/day Aripiprazole, 40-160 mg/day Ziprasidone and 100-600 mg/day Quetiapine. Rapid titration schedule (5-day), until optimal dose was reached, was as a rule used unless severe side effects occur. At the treating physician's discretion, the dose and type of antipsychotic medication could be changed based on clinical efficacy and the profile of side effects during the follow-up period. Antimuscarinic medication, Lormetazepam and Clonazepam were permitted for clinical reasons. No antimuscarinic agents were administered prophylactically. Antidepressants (Sertraline) and mood stabilizers (lithium) were permitted if clinically needed.

Clinical assessment: the severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive symptoms (SAPS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative symptoms (SANS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were used to evaluate symptomatology. To assess general adverse event experiences, the Scale of the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU), the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) and the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) were used. The same trained psychiatrist (BC-F) completed all clinical assessments. These clinical data are described at AZQ2005 study.

Neuropsychological assessment. Cognitive functioning was assessed in patients at 2 points: baseline and 1 year after the initialization of antipsychotic treatment. The cognitive assessment at baseline was carried out at 12 weeks after recruitment because this time is considered optimal for patients' stabilization. The evaluation required approximately 2 h and was carried out in the same day by the same neuropsychologist (R.A.-A and E.G.-R). The neuropsychological battery comprises 9 cognitive domains: information processing speed, motor dexterity, working memory, verbal learning, visuospatial abilities, delayed memory, attention, executive function and theory of mind.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
136
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients followed in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP II) from October 2005 to January 2011.
  • Experiencing their first episode of psychosis (First Episode of Psychosis is defined as that psychopathological state in which for the first time and regardless of its duration, the patient has enough severe psychotic symptoms to allow a diagnosis of psychosis, having received no specific psychiatric treatment for him).
  • Living in the catchment area (Cantabria).
  • No prior treatment with antipsychotic medication or, if previously treated, a total life time of adequate antipsychotic treatment of less than 6 weeks.
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for drug dependence.
  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for mental retardation.
  • Having a history of neurological disease or head injury with loss of consciousness.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Aripiprazole & cognitive batteryAripiprazoleAripiprazole 5-30 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Ziprasidone & cognitive batteryZiprasidoneZiprasidone 40-160 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Aripiprazole & cognitive batteryCognitive batteryAripiprazole 5-30 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Quetiapine & cognitive batteryCognitive batteryQuetiapine 100-600 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Ziprasidone & cognitive batteryCognitive batteryZiprasidone 40-160 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Quetiapine & cognitive batteryQuetiapineQuetiapine 100-600 mg/day. Cognitive battery at baseline and at 1 year.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Global cognitive index1 year

In order to calculate a measure of Global Cognitive Functioning (GCF) raw cognitive scores were reversed when appropriate before standardization so they all have the same direction (the higher, the better). According to previous methodology, the GCF was calculated as T-scores, with raw scores of a healthy comparison sample. T scores were converted to deficit scores that reflect presence and severity of cognitive impairment. Deficit scores on all tests were then "averaged" to create the GCF score.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in working memory1 year

Measured by WAIS - III letter-number sequencing test (standard total score) and WAIS - III digits forward (standard total score).

Change in theory of mind1 year

Measured by Eyes Task (total correct score).

Change in motor dexterity1 year

Measured by Grooved Pegboard Test (time to complete with dominant hand).

Change in visuospatial abilities1 year

Measured by the Rey Complex Figure (RCF) (copy figure).

Change in executive function1 year

Measured by TMT trail B, Stroop Test (color-word), the Zoo Map Test (first and second conditions), the Tower of London Test (ToL) (total correct and total moves score) and letter (FAS) and semantic (animal) fluency tests.

Change in information processing speed1 year

Measured by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) - III digit symbol subtest (standard total score), Trail Making Test (TMT) trail A and Continuous Performance Test (CPT) reaction time.

Change in verbal learning1 year

Measured by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (trials 1-5).

Change in delayed memory1 year

Measured by RAVLT (list recall and list recognition discrimination subscore) and RCF (delayed recall).

Change in attention1 year

Measured by CPT (discrimination subscores).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

🇪🇸

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath