Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04390542
NCT04390542
Withdrawn
N/A

A Pilot Study Evaluating Feasibility, Acceptability, Usability, Satisfaction and Preliminary Efficacy of an Intervention for Caregivers of Patients Undergoing HSCT or CAR T-cell Therapy

ConditionsBlood Cancer

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Blood Cancer
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Primary Endpoint
Average System Usability Scale scores
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine which of two approaches is helpful to support caregivers of patients undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) or Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) T-cell therapy at Seidman Cancer Center. This study will take start before you begin treatment until 2 months after your hospital discharge.

Detailed Description

This is a two-group, randomized pilot study to test the feasibility, acceptability, usability, satisfaction and preliminary efficacy of a behavioral (psychoeducation) intervention, as compared to a usual care (information from healthcare providers) control group, on caregiver outcomes. The control and intervention groups will receive the standard University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (SCC) binder of relevant information regarding care of the patient undergoing HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy. This information will be given to the caregiver by the health care provider. In addition, the intervention group will receive 6 individual sessions with an interventionist during all phases of HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy. The independent variable is group assignment. The primary objective of this study is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a psycho-educational intervention designed for caregivers of patients receiving HSCT (allogenic or autologous) or CAR T-cell therapy. The secondary objective of this study is to explore the usability, satisfaction and preliminary efficacy of a psycho-educational intervention designed for caregivers of patients receiving HSCT (allogenic or autologous) or CAR T-cell therapy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2021
End Date
September 2021
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients:
  • Has a diagnosis of blood cancer (leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, MDS, MPN, CML, CMML) and is scheduled to undergo HCST or CAR T-cell therapy at SCC
  • Will receive HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy and follow-up care from a medical oncologist at University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (SCC)
  • Has English as their primary language
  • Provides consent for his/her own treatment and procedures
  • Has an identified caregiver (per SCC-HSCT and CAR T-cell therapy protocol) who will be involved in the patient's care post-HCST or CAR T-cell therapy
  • Caregivers
  • An adult family or friend (at least 18 years old) of a patient scheduled to receive HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy at SCC
  • Identifies himself/herself as the caregiver who will be responsible for the patient's care post-HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy
  • Has English as their primary language

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Average System Usability Scale scores

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Usability, as measured by average System Usability Scale scores. This is a 10 item scale scored on a 5 point Likert scale with total summed scores ranging from 0-50. Total scores are multiplied by 2 to produce an overall score ranging from 0-100 with scores \> 68 considered to be above average usability.

Mean caregiver satisfaction

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Caregiver satisfaction will be evaluated by having caregivers evaluate their satisfaction with each of the 6 modules at the end of each module. After completing each module, they will be sent via REDCap a single item evaluation scale (0 -10; 0=Not at all satisfied; 10=Highly satisfied). Scores \>7 will be considered acceptable. Mean and standard deviation to describe subjects' overall satisfaction with the intervention reported.

End-of-study caregiver satisfaction scores

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

End-of-study caregiver satisfaction, as measured by end of study exit interview that assesses overall satisfaction with intervention (Likert Scale). Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.

Data collection completion rate

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Feasibility as measured by completion of data collection across study timepoints

Time to identify and recruit dyads in months

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Feasibility, as measured by time to identify and recruit dyads (benchmark 3 months)

Accrual rates

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Feasibility, as measured by accrual rates of eligible participants

Retention rate

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Feasibility, as measured by retention rate

Average acceptability scale scores

Time Frame: 2 months post-hospital discharge, an average of 2 months

Acceptability, as measured by average acceptability scale scores, with overall score ranging from 6-30. According to prior research, a score of 80% of higher (total score of 24 or higher) is considered acceptable for use.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Distress as measured by the the NCCN distress thermometer(Baseline, hospital discharge, 2 months post hospital discharge)
  • Caregiver anxiety as measured by PROMISR Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety scores(Baseline, hospital discharge, 2 months post hospital discharge)
  • Caregiver Healthcare Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL)(Baseline, hospital discharge, 2 months post hospital discharge)

Similar Trials