MedPath

Lamictal as Add-on Treatment for Bipolar I Disorder in Pediatric Patients

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Bipolar Disorder
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00723450
Lead Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Brief Summary

The study will be a multi-center, parallel, group, placebo control, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of lamictal as add-on maintenance treatment in pediatric outpatients (aged 10 to 17 years) diagnosed with Bipolar I disorder. The study consists of 4 phases: Screen (approximately 2 weeks), Open label phase (up to 18 weeks), Randomized phase (up to 36 weeks) and Taper and follow-up phase (up to 4 weeks).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
301
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
placebolamictalPlacebo Controlled
lamictallamictalFlexible Dosing
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)From randomization until Week 36

TOBE was defined by the first prescription of any additional pharmacotherapy to treat bipolar symptoms, increasing the dose(s) of the participants conventional bipolar medication(s), treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, or moving the participant to a more restricted environment for observation, safety, or treatment; or participant withdrawal from the study due to a bipolar-related adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE); or participants withdrawal from the study due to lack of efficacy as defined by rating scale threshold scores. TOBE was calculated using a log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)From randomization until withdrawal from the study for any cause (up to Week 36)

The time from randomization to the withdrawal from study was analyzed. TTW was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Time From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)From randomization until intervention administered for a mood episode (up to Week 36)

The time from randomization to the intervention for a mood episode (depression, mania/hypomania or mixed mood) was analyzed. TIME was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Time From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)From randomization until intervention administered for depression, mania/hypomania or a mixed episode (up to Week 36)

The time from randomization to intervention for depression (TIDep), mania/hypomania (TIMan), or a mixed episode (TIMix) was analyzed. TIDep, TIMan, and TIMix were calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Number of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateFrom randomization until a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state (up to Week 36)

The number of participants requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state were analyzed.

Number of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseFrom randomization up to Week 36

The proportion of participants (par.) requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms, that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state at any time within the first 30, 90, and 180 days in the Randomized Phase were analyzed.

Change From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36

The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Summary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseRandomization weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Summary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP (I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36

The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

The CGI-P is a 10-item scale used to assess attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years of age. The scale is composed of two factors: restless-impulsive behavior and emotional lability. Each item was scored on a 0-3 scale. The range of scores for the CGI-P is 0 (best possible outcome) to 30 (worst possible outcome). The CGI-P was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Change From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Randomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36

The CGI-P is a 10-item scale used to assess attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years of age. The scale is composed of two factors: restless-impulsive behavior and emotional lability. Each item was scored on a 0-3 scale. The range of scores for the CGI-P is 0 (best possible outcome) to 30 (worst possible outcome). The CGI-P was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: "Compared to the Baseline assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?". Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).

Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: "Compared to the Randomization assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?". Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

GSK Investigational Site

šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

Seattle, Washington, United States

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath