Quad Resection (Hot Snare vs Cold Snare vs Hot EMR vs Cold EMR)
- Conditions
- Colon PolypColon CancerColon Adenoma
- Interventions
- Procedure: Cold SnareProcedure: Hot EMRProcedure: Hot SnareProcedure: Cold EMR
- Registration Number
- NCT03462706
- Lead Sponsor
- Indiana University
- Brief Summary
The study will compare the use of cold snare, hot snare, cold EMR, and hot EMR for polyp resection. Although previous studies have compared two of the potential resection methods, no previous study has evaluated all four of the resection methods.
- Detailed Description
The optimal method for removal of polyps 6-9 and 10-15 mm in size is not established. In this study, we propose to evaluate four different treatments for polyps (sized 6mm-15mm). The four treatments are cold snaring without injection, hot snaring without injection, cold EMR, and hot EMR. This study aims to help to establish the optimal resection technique for 6-9 and 10-15 mm polyps.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 238
- Aged 40 years or older
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Subjects with a history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Lesions less than 6mm or greater than 15mm in largest dimension
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cold Snare Cold Snare Polyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using cold snare techniques. Hot EMR Hot EMR Polyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using hot EMR techniques. Hot Snare Hot Snare Polyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using hot snare techniques. Cold EMR Cold EMR Polyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using cold EMR techniques.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Efficacy of Resection (Central Post-Resection Biopsies) 1 day Efficacy of resection will be assessed by biopsies in four quadrants of the perimeter of the defect post-resection and one biopsy from the center of the defect post-resection. Comparison of the biopsy pathology results for polyps removed by cold snare vs. hot snare vs. cold EMR vs. hot EMR. Negative means that there was no residual polyp tissue seen on the central post-resection biopsies. Positive means that there was residual polyp tissue seen on the central post-resection biopsies. Negative central post-resection biopsies are considered a better outcome.
Efficacy of Resection (Peripheral Post-Resection Biopsies) 1 day Efficacy of resection will be assessed by biopsies in four quadrants of the perimeter of the defect post-resection and one biopsy from the center of the defect post-resection. Comparison of the biopsy pathology results for polyps removed by cold snare vs. hot snare vs. cold EMR vs. hot EMR. Negative means that there was no residual polyp tissue seen on the peripheral post-resection biopsies. Positive means that there was residual polyp tissue seen on the peripheral post-resection biopsies. Negative peripheral post-resection biopsies are considered a better outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Indiana University
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States