MedPath

Quad Resection (Hot Snare vs Cold Snare vs Hot EMR vs Cold EMR)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Colon Polyp
Colon Cancer
Colon Adenoma
Interventions
Procedure: Cold Snare
Procedure: Hot EMR
Procedure: Hot Snare
Procedure: Cold EMR
Registration Number
NCT03462706
Lead Sponsor
Indiana University
Brief Summary

The study will compare the use of cold snare, hot snare, cold EMR, and hot EMR for polyp resection. Although previous studies have compared two of the potential resection methods, no previous study has evaluated all four of the resection methods.

Detailed Description

The optimal method for removal of polyps 6-9 and 10-15 mm in size is not established. In this study, we propose to evaluate four different treatments for polyps (sized 6mm-15mm). The four treatments are cold snaring without injection, hot snaring without injection, cold EMR, and hot EMR. This study aims to help to establish the optimal resection technique for 6-9 and 10-15 mm polyps.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
238
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged 40 years or older
  • Ability to provide informed consent
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with a history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Lesions less than 6mm or greater than 15mm in largest dimension
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Cold SnareCold SnarePolyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using cold snare techniques.
Hot EMRHot EMRPolyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using hot EMR techniques.
Hot SnareHot SnarePolyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using hot snare techniques.
Cold EMRCold EMRPolyps sized 6mm to 15mm found during colonoscopy will be removed using cold EMR techniques.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Efficacy of Resection (Central Post-Resection Biopsies)1 day

Efficacy of resection will be assessed by biopsies in four quadrants of the perimeter of the defect post-resection and one biopsy from the center of the defect post-resection. Comparison of the biopsy pathology results for polyps removed by cold snare vs. hot snare vs. cold EMR vs. hot EMR. Negative means that there was no residual polyp tissue seen on the central post-resection biopsies. Positive means that there was residual polyp tissue seen on the central post-resection biopsies. Negative central post-resection biopsies are considered a better outcome.

Efficacy of Resection (Peripheral Post-Resection Biopsies)1 day

Efficacy of resection will be assessed by biopsies in four quadrants of the perimeter of the defect post-resection and one biopsy from the center of the defect post-resection. Comparison of the biopsy pathology results for polyps removed by cold snare vs. hot snare vs. cold EMR vs. hot EMR. Negative means that there was no residual polyp tissue seen on the peripheral post-resection biopsies. Positive means that there was residual polyp tissue seen on the peripheral post-resection biopsies. Negative peripheral post-resection biopsies are considered a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Indiana University

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath