A comparision between External fixator vs Supracutaneous plating in the treatment of open Tibia fractures
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: M968- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of musculoskeletal system, not elsewhere classified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061496
- Lead Sponsor
- AIIMS RAIPUR
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
All cases will be selected on basis of:
Radiological findings confirming open tibia fracture according to Gustilo Anderson classification type 1,2,3(A,B,C) and Tscherne classification grade 1,2,3
Patients more than 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patients who are not willing for surgery
H/o old surgery or fracture in the same limb
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method For open tibia fracture supracutaneous plating is expected to be superior to conventional external fixator in respect with <br/ ><br>Lesser chances of post operative infection <br/ ><br>Better fracture reduction. <br/ ><br>Higher chances of union. <br/ ><br>Lesser incidence and lesser degree of ankle stiffness <br/ ><br>Better LEFS and RUST scores. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2weeks,4weeks,6weeks,12weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method SECONDARY- To assess the intra & post op complications in these procedures <br/ ><br> -To classify open fractures according to Gustilo Anderson & Tscherne classification <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2weeks,4weeks,6weeks,12weeks