MedPath

Effects of Individualized rTMS in DOC Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Disorder of Consciousness
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Interventions
Device: Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Device: individualized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Registration Number
NCT05187000
Lead Sponsor
Qiuyou Xie
Brief Summary

Background: Disorder of consciousness(DOC) is a series of arousal and cognitive disorders secondary to the most severe brain injury. Once a patient is diagnosed with a DOC, a poor prognosis is assumed and the rehabilitation for whom is greatly limited. Therefore, the treatment of DOC poses extraordinary challenges. Various treatments protocols have been reported of successful in promoting rehabilitation of DOC patients. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS), as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, has shown potentials for consciousness rehabilitation of DOC patients as it is effective in regulating the central nervous system.

Methods and design: This protocol is a double-blind randomized sham-controlled crossover trial. Totally 30 participants will be randomly assigned to either group 1 or group 2 in a 1:1 ratio, with 15 patients in each group. Each patient will received 20 sessions, in which 10 sessions will be active and 10 will be sham, separated by 10-days washout period. The active-rTMS will include 10 Hz rTMS over the individual-targeted area on each participants. Primary and secondary evaluating indicators will be performed at each baseline and after rTMS treatment. Primary outcome will be determined as behavioral response to treatment as measured using the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R). Resting-state high-density EEG will be also recorded to investigate the neurophysiological correlates by rTMS.

Discussion:This study will contribute to define the role of rTMS for the treatment of DOC patients and characterise the neural correlates of its action. The investigators proposed a method of individualized target selection for DOC patients based on the existing gold standard CRS-R score and MRI, and used a cross randomized controlled trial to verify the role of rTMS in DOC treatment.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  1. acquired brain injuries less than 1 year and more than 28 days in DOC;
  2. clinical diagnosis of DOC Disease;
  3. no medical history of neuropsychiatric diseases;
  4. no contraindications for rTMS or EEG, no sedatives in use or other drugs that might interfere with brain stimulation, such as Na+ or Ca2+ channel blockers or NMDA receptor antagonists;
  5. stable state of disease and vital signs;
  6. the families of the patients volunteered the patient to participate in the study and provided signed informed consent;
  7. the integrity of the individualized stimulation target cortex are verified by MRI.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. patients in other non-invasive or invasive neuroregulation trials;
  2. motor evoked potential (MEP) in M1 region cannot be induced by TMS pulse;
  3. uncontrolled epilepsy, seizure within 4 weeks before enrollment;
  4. metallic implant in the skull, pacemaker, craniotomy under the stimulated site, implanted brain device.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sham Stimulation Group for Cross StudySham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSham stimulation will be delivered on the patients head using a sham coil in the crossover study.
Individualized rTMS Group for Cross Studyindividualized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationReal stimulation will be delivered on individualized target using a real coil in the crossover study.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R) for Crossover Study 1immediately after 10 days individualized rTMS session

The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R), a total of 23 points, is widely used to define the level of consciousness and assess neurobehavioral recovery of patients with DOC. It is based on six subscales that assess auditory(4 points), visual(5 points), motor(6 points), motor/speech(3 points), communication(2 points), and arousal processes(3 points). Each item of CRS-R is in good agreement with the diagnostic and differential diagnostic criteria of VS/UWS, MCS and EMCS. The higher scores mean a better outcome.

Change from Baseline JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R) for Crossover Study 3immediately after 10 days sham rTMS session

The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R), a total of 23 points, is widely used to define the level of consciousness and assess neurobehavioral recovery of patients with DOC. It is based on six subscales that assess auditory(4 points), visual(5 points), motor(6 points), motor/speech(3 points), communication(2 points), and arousal processes(3 points). Each item of CRS-R is in good agreement with the diagnostic and differential diagnostic criteria of VS/UWS, MCS and EMCS. The higher scores mean a better outcome.

Change from Baseline JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R) for Crossover Study 2immediately after Washout period

The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R), a total of 23 points, is widely used to define the level of consciousness and assess neurobehavioral recovery of patients with DOC. It is based on six subscales that assess auditory(4 points), visual(5 points), motor(6 points), motor/speech(3 points), communication(2 points), and arousal processes(3 points). Each item of CRS-R is in good agreement with the diagnostic and differential diagnostic criteria of VS/UWS, MCS and EMCS. The higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline Resting-State EEG for Crossover Study 2immediately after Washout period

EEG will be acquired from 66 channels with positions of the International 10-20 System for 10 mins. The relative spectral power (RSP) and functional connectivity (FC) of participants will be calculated by the selected artifact-free EEG epochs at five frequency bands: δ (1-4 Hz), θ (4-8 Hz), α (8-13 Hz), β (13-30 Hz), and γ (30-45 Hz). The investigators will compute off-line analysis to calculate RSP and FC.

Change from Baseline Resting-State EEG for Crossover Study 1immediately after 10 days individualized rTMS session

EEG will be acquired from 66 channels with positions of the International 10-20 System for 10 mins. The relative spectral power (RSP) and functional connectivity (FC) of participants will be calculated by the selected artifact-free EEG epochs at five frequency bands: δ (1-4 Hz), θ (4-8 Hz), α (8-13 Hz), β (13-30 Hz), and γ (30-45 Hz). The investigators will compute off-line analysis to calculate RSP and FC.

Change from Baseline Resting-State EEG for Crossover Study 3immediately after 10 days sham rTMS session

EEG will be acquired from 66 channels with positions of the International 10-20 System for 10 mins. The relative spectral power (RSP) and functional connectivity (FC) of participants will be calculated by the selected artifact-free EEG epochs at five frequency bands: δ (1-4 Hz), θ (4-8 Hz), α (8-13 Hz), β (13-30 Hz), and γ (30-45 Hz). The investigators will compute off-line analysis to calculate RSP and FC.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University

🇨🇳

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath