Tolerability of Sedation With Remimazolam Versus Midazolam in Outpatients Undergoing Upper GI or Biliopancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound in a Non-Anesthesiologist Setting: A Prospective Observational Study (REM-EUS Study)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 126
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
This study will observe and compare patient experience during outpatient diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) when moderate sedation is provided with either remimazolam plus fentanyl or midazolam plus fentanyl, according to routine clinical practice.
Both sedation approaches are currently used in standard care. The choice of sedative will be made by the treating physician as part of usual practice and not assigned by the study. The purpose of the study is to evaluate how patients tolerate the procedure with each sedation strategy, focusing on comfort, recovery, and overall procedural experience.
After the procedure, participants will be asked to complete questionnaires about their experience at 1 hour and 24 hours after EUS. The study will also collect information on sedation effectiveness, operator satisfaction, recovery time, adverse events, and costs.
This is a prospective observational single-center study involving adult outpatients undergoing diagnostic EUS. Information collected during routine care, including vital signs, recovery measures, and procedural data, will be analyzed to compare outcomes between the two sedation approaches.
详细描述
Background Digestive endoscopy is typically performed under moderate (conscious) sedation, which does not require anesthesiologist involvement, or deep sedation, usually requiring anesthetic support. Deep sedation is often reserved for lengthy, complex, or therapeutic procedures. Effective sedation in digestive endoscopy is crucial for improving procedural quality, which in turn enhances diagnostic yield, therapeutic effectiveness, and patient tolerability.
For moderate sedation, benzodiazepines (e.g., midazolam) are frequently combined with opioids (e.g., fentanyl citrate or meperidine). While propofol is widely used for sedation in digestive endoscopy, its use is often restricted to anesthesiologist-supported procedures due to risks such as respiratory depression. Despite evidence supporting the safe administration of propofol by non-anesthesiologists, this practice remains controversial, particularly in Italy, where a minority of endoscopists administer propofol with nurse assistance, without an anesthesiologist.
Remimazolam (REM), a benzodiazepine derivative approved in the EU in August 2021 for GI endoscopy and bronchoscopy sedation, offers a rapid onset, short duration, and reversibility with flumazenil, positioning it as a promising alternative. Early trials suggest REM may achieve adequate sedation, shorter initiation times, and fewer adverse events than midazolam or propofol, though multiple doses may be necessary due to its short action. Thus, REM is currently used in many centres for sedation in digestive endoscopy. EUS, which provides high-resolution imaging of the gastrointestinal tract, is increasingly important in diagnosing and managing GI and pancreatic conditions. Diagnostic EUS, being brief and generally safe, may be well-suited to REM sedation, although data on REM's tolerability in this context remain limited and mainly focused on demonstrating comparable safety between REM and other sedatives.
Main aim To observe and compare patient-reported tolerability of remimazolam versus midazolam (both with fentanyl) in outpatient diagnostic EUS.
Secondary aims
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age > 18 years
- •Outpatients undergoing diagnostic EUS (upper GI or biliopancreatic)
- •Informed consent obtained
排除标准
- •Known allergy to study medications
- •Recent upper respiratory infection or asthma attack
- •History of sedative or opioid addiction
- •Advanced oncologic disease with peritoneal metastases
- •ASA score ≥ IV
研究者
Tommaso Pessarelli
Medical Doctor
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Lecco
