Optimal Sedation Analgesia In Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Interventions Determination and Comparison of Median Effective Target Concentration of Propofol In Combination With Fentanyl versus Remifentanil PERFS
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 280
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Incidence of sedation related adverse events (SRAE).
研究概览
简要总结
Background and purpose
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are complex and time consuming procedures that require optimal sedation and analgesia. Propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) is commonly used at our institution in combination with either fentanyl bolus or remifentanil TCI. However, there is a paucity in literature regarding the median effective effect site concentration (EC50, Ce) of propofol for sedation in such time consuming endoscopic procedures, especially when used with remifentanil TCI. This study is being proposed to compare propofol fentanyl and propofol remifentanil regimens when used via TCI at the predetermined median effective target
concentration (EC50) of propofol. The study will be done in two parts. Part 1 will determine the EC50 and EC95 of propofol with fentanyl and remifentanil combinations. Part 2 of the study will compare the two regimens in terms of efficacy of sedation and incidence of sedation related adverse effects.
Methodology
The study will be done in two parts
Part 1 Determination of EC50 and EC90 of propofol
Participants will be randomly allotted to one of two groups:
Group F Fentanyl bolus of 0.5 mcg/kg
Group R Remifentanil TCI at Ce of 2 ng/mL
The EC50 and EC90 of propofol will be determined for both groups using the Dixon up and down sequential allocation method. The first participant in both will receive an initial effect site concentration (Ce) of 2 mcg/ml. The subsequent participants initial starting Ce will be determined based on the response of the previous participant. Propofol Ce will be increased in step size of 0.5 mcg/mL for rescue in case of unsuccessful sedation.
In case of unsuccessful sedation or positive response, the starting Ce of Propofol will be increased by a step size of 0.5 mcg/mL in the subsequent patient. In case of successful sedation or negative response, the starting Ce of Propofol will be decreased by 0.5 mcg/mL in the subsequent patient.
Successful sedation is defined as
MOASS score 2
Patient does not exhibit gag, cough, purposeful bodily movement throughout the procedure.
Part 2
Randomised controlled trial between the two groups at the determined EC90 of propofol.
Participants will be randomly allotted to one of two groups
Group F Fentanyl bolus of 0.5 mcg/kg
Group R Remifentanil TCI at Ce of 2 ng/mL
Both groups of participants will receive propofol TCI at the determined EC90. The primary outcome is the incidence of adverse effects. The secondary outcome will be
Recovery Time - Time to regain MOASS 5 after stopping TCI.
Endoscopist satisfaction (4 point Likert scale - excellent, good, acceptable and poor)
Patient satisfaction (4 point Likert scale - excellent, good, acceptable and poor)
Mean total propofol consumption - in mg/kg.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients aged 18-70 years undergoing upper GI endoscopic interventions (ERCP and EUS-FNA) ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I-III.
排除标准
- •History of allergy to study drugs.
- •Severe cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic or renal disease.
- •Pregnancy and lactation.
- •BMI less than 18 or more than 35 Psychiatric illness or liver dysfunction leading to altered sensorium Documented OSA Anticipated difficult airway.
结局指标
主要结局
Incidence of sedation related adverse events (SRAE).
时间窗: Periprocedure
次要结局
- ED50 and ED90 of propofol in both groups.(Incidence of unsuccessful sedation)
研究者
Dr Shikhar More
Consultant, Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
