Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
- Conditions
- Robotic SurgeryVisceral ObesityRectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: robotic surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT06397053
- Lead Sponsor
- Daorong Wang
- Brief Summary
Our team has previously published articles providing detailed descriptions of the steps involved in both RS and LS. All surgeries adhered to the total mesorectal excision (TME) principle. In RS, a surgeon employed the Da Vinci Xi surgical system featuring a five-port setup, while five physicians conducted LS with a similarly configured five-port approach. Both the RS and LS doctors are experienced. The surgeries were conducted according to standard procedures, and the RS group utilized totally robotic rectal resection.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 242
(1) confirmed pathology of mid-to-low rectal cancer (within 10 centimeters from the anal margin); (2) availability of comprehensive pathological and computed tomography (CT) data; (3) presence of a diagnosis indicating visceral obesity.
Multiple tumor
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description laparoscopic surgery with visceral obesity robotic surgery - robotic surgery with visceral obesity robotic surgery -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method early postoperative problems 2019-2023 early postoperative problems
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital
🇨🇳Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China