跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05805774
NCT05805774招募中不适用

pDIFFIR: Geriatric Periprosthetic DIstal Femur: FIxation Versus Replacement - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Acute Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) Versus Distal Femur Replacement (DFR)

Unity Health Toronto2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 148 人开始时间: 2025年10月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
148
试验地点
2
主要终点
Knee function

研究概览

简要总结

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures are a significant source of morbidity and mortality for elderly patients. One treatment option involved a surgical fixation with plates or nails, screws and cables/wires along the side of your fractured bone. The second method consists in replacing your knee joint with an artificial knee prosthesis (artificial knee joint).

The primary objective is to determine if acute distal femur replacement improves knee pain and functional outcomes compared to surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes are mortality, reoperation, complications, post-operative pain and quality of life. A health economic analysis will be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of both treatments.

A total of 148 patients (74/group) will be enrolled in the study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • • 65 years and older
  • Isolated periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur around a stable primary total knee arthroplasty (Lewis and Rorabeck Type 1-2)
  • Fracture is acute (within 1 week from time of injury)
  • Patient was ambulatory (with or without walking aids) in the community and at home prior to the injury
  • Independent or moderately frail with score of 3 to 6 on the validated Clinical Frailty Scale
  • Patient is able to read and understand the consent form document, or an interpreter is available to the patient at the time of consent and follow-up
  • Patient or substitute decision maker is able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study

排除标准

  • • Active infection around the fracture (soft tissue or bone)
  • Open fracture
  • Bilateral femur fractures
  • Major neuro-vascular injury requiring intervention, compartment syndrome and major neurologic injuries
  • Pathological fracture excluding osteoporosis
  • Ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty using revision components (varus/valgus constraint, stemmed femoral components)
  • Periprosthetic distal femur fracture around a loose or failing primary total knee arthroplasty (Lewis and Rorabeck Type III)
  • Ipsilateral primary partial knee or patellofemoral arthroplasty
  • Previous ORIF of the distal femur or proximal tibia or patella
  • Current or previous extensor mechanism (patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon, or patella fracture) disruption or repair
  • Poly-trauma status (Injury Severity Score>15) or any associated major injuries of the lower extremities that may hinder post-operative ambulation
  • Medical contraindication to surgery

结局指标

主要结局

Knee function

时间窗: 12 months

Compare knee pain between the two groups using the Oxford Knee Score - which is a patient reported outcome measure. It assess knee function and gives a rating from 0 to 48 - being 0 bad knee function and 48 - excellent knee function.

次要结局

  • Mortality(24 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验