Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Locking Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Retrograde Nailing
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Periprosthetic Fractures
- Sponsor
- Unity Health Toronto
- Enrollment
- 94
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
A periprosthetic distal femur fracture is a fracture close to a knee implant. This type of fracture is often difficult to fix because of the close proximity of the two surgical implants which can sometimes interfere with proper bone healing. Improper healing can cause significant impairment and sometimes requires additional surgeries to correct the problem. Despite considerable interest and research put into developing techniques to repair this fracture surgeons do not know which is the best way to treat this type of fracture.
Our multicentre orthopaedic study group is conducting this study to compare two standard, but different treatments for periprosthetic distal femur fractures. One treatment consists of open surgery and the placement of a plate and screws along the side of the femur. The other consists of implanting an intramedullary nail in the femur.
The goal of this study is to directly compare the two treatments to see if one treatment results in better patient outcomes than the other.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: 3 months
The TUG is a very simple timed test that was introduced in 1991 to measure mobility in the elderly. It involves documenting the time, in seconds, taken for subjects to rise from a standard arm chair, walk to a line on the floor 3 meters away, turn, return, and sit down again
Secondary Outcomes
- Rates of re-operation(12 months)