MedPath

Guided Versus Conventional Periapical Endodontic Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Endodontic Re-treatment Failure
Endodontic Disease
Interventions
Device: 3D guide
Device: Mock guide
Registration Number
NCT04133181
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery. Patients having mandibular posterior teeth indicated for endodontic surgery will be selected. Full medical and dental history will be obtained from all patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either guided endodontic surgery or conventional endodontic surgery. Surgical procedures will be done under magnification. Root-end cavities will be filled using MTA.Post surgical instrucions will be given to patients. Surgical time will be recorded. Clinical and radiographic success will be asses at 6 and 12 month.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
26
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients in good general health.
  2. Patients with age ranging between 18-50 years with no sex predilection.
  3. Posterior teeth with an indication for endodontic surgery.
  4. Patients' acceptance to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with allergy to materials or medications used in the trial.
  2. Pregnant female patients.
  3. Teeth with pathoses associated with vertical root fracture.
  4. Severe periodontal bone loss detected with a periodontal probe (5 mm probing depth).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Guided endodontic surgery3D guideUse of a 3D surgical guide in endodontic surgery
Conventional endodontic surgeryMock guideUse of a mock guide in endodontic surgery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical success1 year

Clinical assessment using a scale by friedman et al 2005 (healed, healing and persisting disease) which healed mean absence of clinical signs and symptoms, persisting disease mean presence of clinical signs and symptoms

Radio graphic Success1 year

Radiograhic assessment using a scale by friedman et al 2005 (healed, healing and persisting disease) which healed mean radiographic classification of complete healing or incomplete healing, persisting disease mean radiographic classification of unsatisfactory healing.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time of surgeryDuring surgery

Recording the surgical time in minutes.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath