Guided Versus Conventional Periapical Endodontic Surgery
- Conditions
- Endodontic Re-treatment FailureEndodontic Disease
- Interventions
- Device: 3D guideDevice: Mock guide
- Registration Number
- NCT04133181
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery.
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery. Patients having mandibular posterior teeth indicated for endodontic surgery will be selected. Full medical and dental history will be obtained from all patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either guided endodontic surgery or conventional endodontic surgery. Surgical procedures will be done under magnification. Root-end cavities will be filled using MTA.Post surgical instrucions will be given to patients. Surgical time will be recorded. Clinical and radiographic success will be asses at 6 and 12 month.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 26
- Patients in good general health.
- Patients with age ranging between 18-50 years with no sex predilection.
- Posterior teeth with an indication for endodontic surgery.
- Patients' acceptance to participate in the study.
- Patients with allergy to materials or medications used in the trial.
- Pregnant female patients.
- Teeth with pathoses associated with vertical root fracture.
- Severe periodontal bone loss detected with a periodontal probe (5 mm probing depth).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Guided endodontic surgery 3D guide Use of a 3D surgical guide in endodontic surgery Conventional endodontic surgery Mock guide Use of a mock guide in endodontic surgery
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical success 1 year Clinical assessment using a scale by friedman et al 2005 (healed, healing and persisting disease) which healed mean absence of clinical signs and symptoms, persisting disease mean presence of clinical signs and symptoms
Radio graphic Success 1 year Radiograhic assessment using a scale by friedman et al 2005 (healed, healing and persisting disease) which healed mean radiographic classification of complete healing or incomplete healing, persisting disease mean radiographic classification of unsatisfactory healing.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time of surgery During surgery Recording the surgical time in minutes.