Clinical and Radiographic Success of Guided Versus Conventional Periapical Endodontic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 26
- Primary Endpoint
- Radio graphic Success
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery.
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery. Patients having mandibular posterior teeth indicated for endodontic surgery will be selected. Full medical and dental history will be obtained from all patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either guided endodontic surgery or conventional endodontic surgery. Surgical procedures will be done under magnification. Root-end cavities will be filled using MTA.Post surgical instrucions will be given to patients. Surgical time will be recorded. Clinical and radiographic success will be asses at 6 and 12 month.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients in good general health.
- •Patients with age ranging between 18-50 years with no sex predilection.
- •Posterior teeth with an indication for endodontic surgery.
- •Patients' acceptance to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with allergy to materials or medications used in the trial.
- •Pregnant female patients.
- •Teeth with pathoses associated with vertical root fracture.
- •Severe periodontal bone loss detected with a periodontal probe (5 mm probing depth).
Arms & Interventions
Guided endodontic surgery
Use of a 3D surgical guide in endodontic surgery
Intervention: 3D guide (Device)
Conventional endodontic surgery
Use of a mock guide in endodontic surgery
Intervention: Mock guide (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Radio graphic Success
Time Frame: 1 year
Radiograhic assessment using a scale by friedman et al 2005 (healed, healing and persisting disease) which healed mean radiographic classification of complete healing or incomplete healing, persisting disease mean radiographic classification of unsatisfactory healing.
Clinical success
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical assessment using a scale by friedman et al 2005 (healed, healing and persisting disease) which healed mean absence of clinical signs and symptoms, persisting disease mean presence of clinical signs and symptoms
Secondary Outcomes
- Time of surgery(During surgery)
Investigators
ahmed meneisy
Doctor Degree candidate
Cairo University