An observation and comparison of the efficacy and relative satisfaction of Health Care Workers while being monitored by the standard BUDDY technique versus the Remote Audio Visual Doffing Surveillance (RADS) of the doffing process during the COVID 19 Pandemic
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/11/029233
- Lead Sponsor
- aveen Naik B
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Should have undergone training in the donning and doffing process at least once or twice.
2.A member of the staff working at the COVID unit in PGIMER.
Exclusion Criteria
1.The HCW who will be doffing for the first time.
2.The HCW doffing due to an emergency (health issue of the HCW, or due to an observed damage in the PPE).
3.Pregnant, breast feeding, history of joint replacements or other prosthetic devices, inflammatory skin conditions or having open wounds.
4.Refuses to participate in the study.
5.HCW who is performing this study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study and compare the incidence of error with regard to the standard CDC doffing guidelines during the doffing process of health care workers while they are being monitored by a buddy and also when they are being monitored using Remote Audio-visual Doffing Surveillance (RADS) monitoring system.Timepoint: Comparison will be done after completion of all the case observations i.e at the end of the study
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the satisfaction of the HCWâ??s regarding their own safety while they are being monitored by the two techniques.Timepoint: The comparison of the satisfaction among the two groups will be done at the end of the study.