Comparison of Band & loop space maintainer fabricated by 3 different techniques in children of 5-9 years.
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/06/068337
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Nupur Ninawe
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Children between ages 5-9 years old showing Frankl Behavioural Rating scale scores of 3 and 4
primary molar loss in the last one week due to caries, periapical infection, and resorption to eliminate possible space loss
The presence of the successor tooth germ to justify the use of band and loop space maintainer
at least 1 year for the successor tooth to erupt to ensure that the band and loop space maintainer remain in the mouth until the end of the study.
Presence of adequate post-extraction space for the unhindered eruption of the successor tooth.
No symptoms of pulpal pathology in the abutment teeth that will support band and loop space maintainer to prevent possible abutment tooth loss
class I occlusion and no skeletal anomaly to prevent abnormal occlusal forces.
only one tooth loss in the same quadrant to confirm the indication for a fixed band and loop space maintainer.
For 3D printed Band and loop space maintainer, permanent molar should not be erupted.
Parents or caretakers who are willing to participate in this study.
Children showing Frankl Behavioural Rating scale scores 1 and 2.
Children with systemic diseases or children who require special health care needs.
Children with a history of systemic antibiotics or any medication in the last 3 months.
More than 2 weeks since tooth loss to eliminate possible space loss
Less than one year left for the permanent tooth to erupt tooth to prevent possible abutment tooth loss
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method