Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03979183
NCT03979183
Completed
Not Applicable

'Physio-EndEA' Study: a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of a Supervised and Adapted Rehabilitation Program to Improve Quality of Life in Women Diagnosed With Endometriosis

Universidad de Granada1 site in 1 country26 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2020
ConditionsEndometriosis

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Endometriosis
Sponsor
Universidad de Granada
Enrollment
26
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in quality of life assessed by EHP-30
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Given (1) the high volume of women on reproductive age that have a clinical diagnosis of endometriosis and (2) the poor management of symptoms that medical treatment usually achieves, new therapeutic interventions need to be evaluated in order to improve pain and quality of life in those patients. Therefore, 'Physio-EndEA' study has been designed to evaluate whether therapeutic exercise could help on the management of endometriosis-related symptoms

Detailed Description

Background: Prevalence of endometriosis is approximately 10% of women of childbearing age. Pain, considered in its multiple versions (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria and, in general, chronic pelvic pain) is the most common and disabilitating symptom in affected women. Usual care, consisting on palliative pharmacological treatment in combination with surgery, is clearly insufficient and physical therapies need to be explored in order to reduce pain and to improve quality of life in affected women. Objective: The overall objective of 'Physio-EndEA' study will be to explore potential short and mid-term benefits of a rehabilitation program on the quality of life of symptomatic women. Methods: A total of 26 symptomatic endometriosis women will be recruited. Inclusion criteria includes: aged 18-50, clinical diagnosis of endometriosis and interested in improving lifestyle while exclusion criteria includes: diagnosed chronic disease or orthopaedic issues that would interfere with ability to participate in a physical activity program. Women will be randomized to either intervention (n=13) or usual care group (n=13). Intervention group will receive twice weekly session for 9 weeks and control group will receive recommendations about healthy lifestyle and usual care. Discussion: This study attempts to improve the quality of life of symptomatic endometriosis women by reducing musculoskeletal and occupational impairments. Findings will offer a new therapeutic approach for a better pain control.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2020
End Date
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Francisco Artacho Cordón

Principal Investigator

Universidad de Granada

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Premenopausal status
  • Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis by laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound imaging
  • History of clinical symptoms
  • To be able to walk without assistance
  • To be able to read and write enough
  • To be capable and willing to provide consent
  • Interested in improving lifestyle

Exclusion Criteria

  • Acute or terminal illness
  • Presence of any chronic disease or orthopedic issues that would interfere with ability to participate in a physical activity program
  • Unwillingness to complete the study requirements
  • Be registered in other exercise program

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in quality of life assessed by EHP-30

Time Frame: Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention

It will be assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30). It is a self-administered disease-specific instrument to measure QoL in women with endometriosis. The 30-item EHP, referred to the last 4 weeks, is comprised of five domains: pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image. Items within each subscale, answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale, are summed and then transformed to a percentage scale ranging from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worse health status) by dividing the raw score of all items by the maximum possible raw score, multiplied by 100

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pressure pain threshold (PPT)(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Catastrophizing thoughts(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Muscle trunk flexor and extensor endurance(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Functional capacity(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Pain intensity(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Muscle thickness(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Body mass index(Baseline)
  • Self-perceived physical fitness(Baseline)
  • Body Balance(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Flexibility of the lumbar spine(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Skeletal muscle mass(Baseline)
  • Gastrointestinal function(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Sleep quality(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Body fat(Baseline)
  • Chronic fatigue(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)
  • Sexual function(Baseline, inmediately after intervention and 1-year post-intervention)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials