Study Comparing Quantitative Assessments in Open-angle Glaucoma (OAG) and/or Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
- Conditions
- Glaucoma, Open-AngleOcular Hypertension
- Interventions
- Other: No Treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT01540370
- Lead Sponsor
- Allergan
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate assessments from the Goniometric Lens compared with those from anterior segment imaging in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and/or ocular hypertension (OHT).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
- Open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
- Allergy or sensitivity to diagnostic agents used in study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients with OAG and/or OHT No Treatment Patients with OAG and/or OHT
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intra- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens Day 1 Intra-rater agreement (for each of the 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: \<0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
Inter- Examiner Agreement in Angle Width by Goniometric Lens Day 1 Inter-rater agreement (among 6 raters) of Large Step angle width (range: 0.5 to 5.5 with 0.5 unit intervals) was evaluated using weighted kappa (Fleiss-Cohen) statistics. The angle is the area between the iris and cornea of the eye. Each examiner performed a pair of angle-width measurements by goniometric lens predilation (ie, 2 measurements per examiner). The degree of agreement within raters was interpreted according to Landis and Koch, where: \<0:poor, 0.00-0.20:slight, 0.21-0.40:fair, 0.41-0.60:moderate, 0.61-0.80:substantial, and 0.81-1.00:almost perfect.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method