跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/04/065074
CTRI/2024/04/065074尚未招募Unknown

Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

MGM dental college and hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2024年4月20日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
To evaluate and compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless

研究概览

简要总结

To evaluate and compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless pressure injection technique and conventional injection technique during dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline and to evaluate and compare difference in pain felt during delivery of local anesthetic agent, Volume of Local anesthetic drug required, Local Complication using needleless pressure injection technique and conventional injection technique for dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients in the age group 18-60 years.
  • Both Male and Female patients.
  • Patients indicated for extractions of single tooth which can be extracted using infiltration technique.

排除标准

  • Patients with known allergy to amide type of local anesthetic agent Patients having active local infections, abscess or any other lesion at the injection site.
  • Patients with systemic co-morbidities that would preclude administration of local anesthesia or adrenaline (eg- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc.) or are contraindication of extraction.
  • Patients taking medications such as anticoagulant Alcohol consumption 48 hours before of study.
  • Patients not willing to participate in the study.

结局指标

主要结局

To evaluate and compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless

时间窗: Immediate after 7 days

pressure injection technique and conventional injection technique

时间窗: Immediate after 7 days

during dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and

时间窗: Immediate after 7 days

1:2,00,000 Adrenaline

时间窗: Immediate after 7 days

次要结局

  • To evaluate & compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless(pressure injection technique & conventional injection technique)

研究者

申办方类型
Other [self funded]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Arfath Shaikh

MGM Dental College and Hospital, navi mumbai

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验