跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/10/096311
CTRI/2025/10/096311尚未招募不适用

Effectiveness of in-situ simulation and human factors analysis using quality improvement cycles to mitigate latent safety threats in emergency airway management

Jawaharalal institute of postgraduate medical education and research1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2025年11月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
To measure the trend in mean LST hazard score per simulation.

研究概览

简要总结

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of insitu simulation combined with the human factors analysis and Quality improvement cyclesin identifying and mitigating latent safety threats in emergency airway management.Emergency airway procedures are high risk and time sensitive requiring coordinated team work.Through structured insitu simulation exercises conducted in the Emergency Department the study aims to identify system level gaps and human factor issues that can compromise patient safety.

Following each simulation a structured debriefing and human factor analysis will be carried out to catogorize LSTs.Based on the findings, targeted interventions will be implemented using Plan Do Study Act cycles.The effectiveness of these interventions will be assessed by monitoring changes in the frequency,severity,and nature of LSTs over the time.

Participants will include healthcare workers involved in aiway management including emergency physicians, residents,nurses,emergency medical technicians,and interns.The study is intented to contribute to improved patient outcomes and enhanced team based care in high stakes emergency situations.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Day(s) 至 60.00 Day(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • All Emergency department clinical staff including emergency physicians,residents,nurses,Emergency medicine technicians rostered for duty during scheduled simulation windows.

排除标准

  • Staff not typically involved in airway management.visiting or temporary staff unfamiliar with Emergency Medicine protocol.

结局指标

主要结局

To measure the trend in mean LST hazard score per simulation.

时间窗: Baseline. | After each PDSA cycle. | At the end of study period.

To measure the Change in frequency of critical LSTs.

时间窗: Baseline. | After each PDSA cycle. | At the end of study period.

To measure change in quantified profile of latent safety threats over the study period.

时间窗: Baseline. | After each PDSA cycle. | At the end of study period.

To measure the trend in LST frequency per simulation.

时间窗: Baseline. | After each PDSA cycle. | At the end of study period.

次要结局

  • Time to scuccessful intubation.

研究者

发起方
Jawaharalal institute of postgraduate medical education and research
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr SUBASHINI G

Jawaharlal institute of postgraduate medical education and research

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验