Comparison between Ultrasound guided infraclavicular block versus retroclavicular block with 0.5 percent levobupivacaine
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 76
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Intraoperative and postoperative pain, assessment using VAS SCORE.
研究概览
简要总结
Our general objective is to make a formal comparison between RCB[10, 11] and coracoid ICB for brachial plexus anaesthesia. This study will delineate the differences between the two techniques. Our aim is to compare both techniques in terms of scanning time, needling time, total anaesthesia time, needle visibility, block needle passes, block success and early and late complications. We made the hypothesis that, while providing similar efficacy and better needle visualization than coracoid ICB, the time taken to perform RCB will not exceed the time taken to perform its comparator.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Not Applicable
- 盲法
- Not Applicable
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients willing to participate in study.
- •Patients above the age of 18 years having the concerned disease.
- •Elective surgery of the hand, wrist, forearm or elbow.
- •Able to provide valid written consent.
排除标准
- •Patients refusal Systemic or local infection at the needle entry point Coagulopathy Severe pulmonary condition Local anaesthetic allergy Pregnancy Preexisting neurologic symptoms in the ipsilateral limb.
结局指标
主要结局
Intraoperative and postoperative pain, assessment using VAS SCORE.
时间窗: 5 min,10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 25 min,30 min, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
Extent of block and duration of block assessed using dermatomal distribution at 30 min, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours postoperatively.
时间窗: 5 min,10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 25 min,30 min, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
Extent and duration of motor and sensory block.
时间窗: 5 min,10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 25 min,30 min, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
次要结局
- Needle visibility(Block success rate)