Comparison of 3 Techniques for Recreation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomic Footprint
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Registration Number
- NCT02795247
- Lead Sponsor
- OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the tomographic results of patients who underwent single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the investigator's institution using the transtibial, accessory medial portal technique and the modified transtibial technique to determine which technique best recreates the anterior cruciate ligament anatomic footprint.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients presenting for single bundle ACL reconstruction, with or without associated partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair.
- Skeletally mature patients
- Patients who are able and willing to receive post-operative CT imaging of the affected knee
Exclusion Criteria
- Previous ACL reconstruction in the studied knee
- Previous ACL injury or reconstruction in the contralateral kneeConcomitant non-ACL ligament reconstruction or osteotomy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 3D reconstructed CT imaging 6 weeks Post-Operatively Used to measure tunnel position.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation 2 year post-operative Change in IKDC subjective knee evaluation since before surgery
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) 2 year post-operative Change in KOOS since before surgery
Knee Laxity 6 month post-operatively Pivot shift test will be used to a measure of knee laxity
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
OrthoCarolina Sports Center
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
OrthoCarolina Sports Center🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States