Correlation of Pain Tolerance with Participant Predicated VS Therapist Estimated One RM in Normal Individuals
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 165
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1. Intensity of Galvanic Current
研究概览
简要总结
There are lack of evidences regarding correlation of pain tolerance and strength in the Population. In previous studies pain threshold was measured by providing heat using Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer ,Pressure Algometer or Autoalgometer, Ice Cold Cylinder, but as it is not available in our OPD we prefer using Galvanic Current for its availability . In this study pain tolerance will be checked using galvanic current
As 1 RM is very important entity in exercise program we want to find if it is correlated with pain tolerance
Aim of our study is to check whether individual who have less pain tolerance assume that they have less strength or Is there any correlation or discrepancy between participant predicted and therapist estimated 1RM.
The implications and therapeutic applications of these findings are significant and wide ranging if laboratory based measurement of individual differences in pain sensitivity can prospectively predict individual differences in acute clinical pain, chronic pain and pain medication response.
In multiple papers and reviews, recent research has highlighted the potential therapeutic uses of experimental pain assessment (e.g., for predicting post-operative pain, therapy response, etc.). These papers and reviews have used quantitative sensory testing to quantify pain sensitivity.
Quantitative sensory assessments of pain sensitivity aren’t used very often because of the time, money, and expertise requirements, not to mention their costs. So, the purpose of this study is to determine whether self-reporting can be a valid indicator of a person’s pain threshold and patient anticipated 1 RM.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
入选标准
- •1.18 to 60 Years of Individual 2.Both Genders 3.Individuals with Normal Superficial Sensations like Touch ,Pain, Temparature at the forearm region.
排除标准
- •1.Individuals with Co morbidities like Diabetes 2.Individuals with Dermatological Condition 3.Individuals with Neurological Condition 4.Injuries or lesions around knee.
结局指标
主要结局
1. Intensity of Galvanic Current
时间窗: 6 months
2.Hand Held Dynamometer
时间窗: 6 months
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Bharati D Asgaonkar
Associate Professor
