An Implementation Model for Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure Prescribing
- Conditions
- Decision Support Systems, ClinicalHeart Failure
- Interventions
- Other: Decision Support Systems, Clinical
- Registration Number
- NCT04028557
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Brief Summary
The objective of this proposal is to compare clinical outcomes, implementation metrics (i.e., patient reach and clinician adoption), and clinician preferences of two designs (customized vs. commercial) of a clinical decision support (CDS). Beta blocker prescribing for patients with heart failure will be used as a test case. The best practices in CDS design, including the user-centered design will be incorporated into the customized CDS and compared to a commercially-available CDS in the electronic health record using a cluster randomized trial.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 118
- Prescribing primary care clinicians at University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) who provide care for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
- None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Commercial CDS Decision Support Systems, Clinical The commercial CDS is available to all institutions using the Epic electronic health record vendor, but violates some CDS design best practices, notably not being tailored to the end users of a given health system. The recommendation will be to initiate an evidence-based beta blocker for heart failure. Customized CDS Decision Support Systems, Clinical The customized CDS will be designed and implemented with comprehensive application of known best practice principles in CDS design. The recommendation will be to initiate an evidence-based beta blocker for heart failure.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in prescription of Beta blocker (BB) 6 months post CDS implementation Number of prescriptions of an evidence based BB during a primary care office visit.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Factors Influencing Clinician Adoption of the CDS per Qualitative Interviews 6 months post CDS implementation Clinician-reported factors that influence adoption of the CDS.
Clinician Adoption 6 months post CDS implementation The proportion of CDS who were not outright dismissed by the clinician.
Patient Reach 6 months post CDS implementation The proportion of unique patients with heart failure who were seen by primary care and not taking an evidence based BB who the CDS fired for.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Colorado Health
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States