A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF REVERSE TECHNIQUE VS STANDARD TECHNIQUE OF I-GEL PLACEMENT IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/05/052964
- Lead Sponsor
- HINDURAO HOSPITA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
• Patients of either sex between 1-15 years of age
• Patients weighing between 5 - 70 kgs
• Patients of height 65 - 175 cms
• Patients belonging to ASA physical status grade I â?? II
• Patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia
1. Patients refusing to participate in study
2. Children with upper respiratory tract infection
3. Children with Restricted mouth opening, trismus, pharyngo - perilaryngeal abscess, trauma or mass in the pharynx,retrognathia
4. Patients with Congenital heart disease
5. Patients with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration.
6. Body mass Index of < 18 and > 25 Kg/m2
7. Reactive airway or parenchymal disease.
8. Patients with history of respiratory, renal or hepatic disease
9. Patients undergoing emergency surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the success rate of insertion in 1st attempt between the standard and reverse techniques of I - gelTM placement <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 0mins,1min <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To Compare : <br/ ><br>1.Time taken for insertion <br/ ><br>2.Ease of insertion of I-gelTM <br/ ><br>3.Number of attempts taken to pass I-gelTM successfully <br/ ><br>4.Manoeuvers required, if any <br/ ><br>5.Ease of placement of Nasogastric tube <br/ ><br>6.Complications, if any <br/ ><br>7.Hemodynamics of the patient <br/ ><br>8.Any other observation arising during the study period <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 0mins,1min,3mins,5mins,post operatively