A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Tymbion Iontophoresis and Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for Adults in an Office Setting
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Following Tympanic Membrane Tap for Subjects Treated With Active Tymbion Iontophoresis Compared to VAS Score for Subjects Treated With Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis.
Study Overview
Brief Summary
A prospective, multicenter study to determine if active Tymbion iontophoresis is superior to sham Tymbion iontophoresis in providing anesthesia to the tympanic membrane (TM). The study will use the Tula iontophoresis systems for healthy adult volunteers in an office setting, called Group A of Protocol CPR007003.
The protocol CPR007003 also includes a Group B study described in a separate Registration (NCT03197558).
Detailed Description
The objective of the study is to determine if active Tymbion iontophoresis is superior to sham Tymbion iontophoresis in providing anesthesia to the tympanic membrane. In addition, safety will be evaluated by review of the occurrence of adverse events.
The iontophoresis system (IPS) will be used to facilitate anesthetic delivery to the tympanic membrane (TM). The lidocaine-based solution used for local anesthesia of the TM is Tymbion (2% lidocaine HCl/ 1:100,000 epinephrine).
Group A will consist of 40 evaluable healthy adult subjects randomized (1:1) to receive unilateral treatment (1 ear) with either active Tymbion iontophoresis or sham Tymbion iontophoresis. The sham iontophoresis procedure will be identical to the active Tymbion iontophoresis, with the exception that the iontophoresis current will not be activated (ie, the same drug solution will be applied to ears in both arms). After the completion of the iontophoresis procedure, the tympanic membrane will be tapped with a dull otologic probe to test the level of anesthesia. The subject will rate the level of pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately after the tap. Investigators and subjects will be blinded to treatment assignment.
Safety assessments will be done post procedure and at follow as applicable.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Arms & Interventions
Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis
The sham iontophoresis procedure will be identical to the active Tymbion iontophoresis in that Tymbion (2% lidocaine/ 1:100,000 epinephrine solution) will be placed in the external ear canal, however the iontophoresis current delivery (which facilitates penetration of drug into the tympanic membrane tissue) will not be activated.
Intervention: Tymbion Lidocaine/epinephrine solution (Drug)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Following Tympanic Membrane Tap for Subjects Treated With Active Tymbion Iontophoresis Compared to VAS Score for Subjects Treated With Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis.
Time Frame: Day 0
The VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) line with a statement at each end representing the extreme limits of pain intensity (where 0 represents "No pain" and 100 represents "The worst imaginable pain"). The subject reports their pain intensity by making a mark along the line and the line is measured to convert the subject response to numeric score (0-100 in millimeters). The data will be summarized as the difference in mean VAS scores between the two treatment groups (active Tymbion iontophoresis compared to sham Tymbion iontophoresis).
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported