Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03455374
NCT03455374
Terminated
Not Applicable

Diamondback Atherectomy With OCT Visualization for Calcified PAD Lesions for Calcified Peripheral Vascular Disease Lesions

Arkansas Heart Hospital2 sites in 1 country10 target enrollmentAugust 8, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Sponsor
Arkansas Heart Hospital
Enrollment
10
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in luminal area gain, measured in mm, in treated segment of the vessel wall
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm study using CSI Orbital Atherectomy System in patients with PAD (total occlusions or significant stenosis). Patients will be enrolled if they have claudication and/or critical limb ischemia, and identifiable PAD disease with moderate to severe calcification on Computer Tomography Angiogram (PCA) or peripheral angiogram requiring percutaneous peripheral intervention (PPI).

Detailed Description

Orbital atherectomy (OA) is one of the most commonly used modalities for the treatment of obstructive femoral-popliteal PAD, especially in patients with large and calcified atherosclerotic plaques, either as stand alone or with subsequent drug-coated balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. These atherectomy procedures were primarily guided by peripheral angiography which has significant resolution limitations in regards to the plaque morphology and characteristics such as extent of calcification, and how deep the cuts are made in the vessel wall. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has recently emerged as a novel imaging modality. OCT imaging has been used both in coronary as well as in peripheral circulation extensively with no significant device related adverse effects. Previous research has shown the feasibility and safety of OCT use for peripheral artery imaging and its use in plaque characterization. The hypothesis for this study is that; use of diamond back atherectomy device will lead to effective removal of plaque in moderate to heavily calcified arteries without damaging deep into the adventitia or EEL or the adjacent healthy vessel wall and thus will lead to a favorable vascular response during follow up.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 8, 2017
End Date
May 13, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Arkansas Heart Hospital
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • • Patient with lower extremity claudication and PAD due to significant SFA or below the knee stenosis (50%≤99%) or total occlusions (100%) that affects the quality of life despite medical therapy.
  • Evidence of significant SFA or below the knee disease involving the most symptomatic limb by noninvasive vascular testing with the use of the following:
  • ABI: \<0.9 (If ABI\>1.4, SFA systolic acceleration time should be \> 140 milliseconds);
  • TBI: \<0.6;
  • Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) confirming at least a 50% SFA stenosis with moderate to severe calcification; or
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) confirming at least a 50% SFA or below the knee stenosis with moderate to severe calcification.
  • At least one patent, non-treated below the knee vessel.
  • Male and female patients that are ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Subject has been advised of the beneficial effects of smoking cessation and regular exercise but must not be in the process of changing their smoking status at the time of screening. Patients may resume or increase exercising as an effect of post procedurally improved lower limb perfusion.
  • Peak Walking Time (PWT) limited only by claudication.

Exclusion Criteria

  • • Planned amputation.
  • Any planned/scheduled revascularization procedures ≤ 30 days after baseline procedure.
  • Prior lower extremity revascularization ≤ 30 days before baseline procedure.
  • The target lesion is an in-stent restenosis.
  • Infra-popliteal disease involving the last remaining vessel.
  • Patients with a creatinine clearance \< 30mL/min.
  • Patients with known bleeding disorders.
  • Patients with known active pathological bleeding.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel bisulfate, ticagrelor, Aspirin, or other antiplatelets/anticoagulants.
  • Patients with known history of intracranial hemorrhage at any time, GI bleed in the past 6 months, or major surgery within the past 30 days.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in luminal area gain, measured in mm, in treated segment of the vessel wall

Time Frame: Baseline and 7 month

Luminal area gain in the treated segment of the vessel wall between pre-and post-atherectomy OCT images.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Atherectomy OCT Analysis-plaque volume(0 and 7 months)
  • Atherectomy OCT Analysis- new dissections(0 and 7 months)
  • Atherectomy images Analysis-Luminal area loss(0 and 7 months)
  • Atherectomy OCT Analysis-fibrous tissue(0 and 7 months)
  • Atherectomy OCT Analysis-new injuries(0 and 7 months)
  • Atherectomy images Analysis-persistent dissections(0 and 7 months)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials