Maxim® Knee Pop-Top® Tibia vs. Regular Maxim® Knee Tibia
- Conditions
- Traumatic ArthritisRheumatoid ArthritisOsteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Device: Regular Maxim® Knee SystemDevice: Maxim® Knee System with Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia
- Registration Number
- NCT00579059
- Lead Sponsor
- Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective clinical data collection is to compare the outcomes of two different tibial bearings: the Maxim® Pop-Top® Tibia and Maxim® Modular Tibia.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this prospective clinical data collection is to document and compare the performance and clinical outcomes between the Maxim® Knee System with Removable Molded Poly Tibia and the Maxim® Knee System with Modular Tibial Bearing as two treatment groups.
FDA has cleared these devices via Premarket Notification 510(k)'s K991753, K984623, K993159, K010027. The data gathered will be collated and used to provide feedback to designing engineers, support marketing efforts and answer potential questions from reimbursement agencies.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 31
Identical to the indications stated in the FDA approved labeling for the device (cleared in 510(k) K991753,
K984623, K993159, K010027). These indications are stated below:
- Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved.
- Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity.
- Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous joint replacement procedure.
Patient selection factors to be considered include:
- need to obtain pain relief and improve function,
- ability and willingness of the patient to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level,
- a good nutritional state of the patient,
- the patient must have reached full skeletal maturity.
- Porous coated knee joint replacement prostheses have not been approved for non-cemented applications in the United States.
Identical to the contraindications stated in the FDA approved labeling for the device (cleared in 510(k) K991753, K984623, K993159, K010027's). These contraindications are stated below:
Absolute contraindications include:
- infection,
- sepsis
- osteomyelitis.
Relative contraindications include:
- uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions,
- Osteoporosis,
- metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation,
- osteomalacia,
- distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site,
- rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram,
- vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, neuromuscular disease,
- incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 Regular Maxim® Knee System Maxim® Regular Tibia 1 Maxim® Knee System with Removable Molded Polyethylene Tibia Maxim® Pop-Top® Tibia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knee Society Function Score 1 Year The function score is detailed below as a Range; 100 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 90-100 is considered "Excellent," 60-89 is considered "Good," 30-59 is considered "fair," and 0-29 is considered "poor."
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Range of Motion - Flexion 1 Year This represents how far the patients were able to flex the knee in the clinic at 1-year.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
🇺🇸Warsaw, Indiana, United States