MedPath

Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block Versus Interscalen Brachial Plexus Block for Clavicle Surgery

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Clavicle Injury
Clavicle Fracture
Registration Number
NCT04332497
Lead Sponsor
Medipol University
Brief Summary

The pain after clavicle fracture surgery may be managed with combined superficial cervical plexus-interscalene block and recently clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. CPB may be an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the US-guided CPB and ISCB for postoperative analgesia management after clavicle surgery. The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

Detailed Description

Clavicle fracture is common in men and children after a direct fall on shoulder during sport activity such as cycling or an injury during a traffic accident. The pain after clavicle fracture surgery may be managed with combined superficial cervical plexus-interscalene block (ISCB) and recently clavipectoral fascia plane block (CPB). CPB was defined by Valdes in 2017 firstly. It may be used for postoperative analgesia after clavicle surgery. The clavipectoral fascia covers the clavicular site of the pectoralis major muscle. It provides the potential interfascial space between the clavicle and the pectoralis major muscle. CPB provide effective analgesia after clavicle surgery. It is also easy to perform. With this advantage and its analgesic effectiveness for clavicle surgery, CPB may be an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block. However, randomized clinical efficacy trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of CPB for clavicle fractures. In the literature, data about CPB is so limited, however it seems a good alternative to brachial plexus block for pain management after clavicle fracture.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the US-guided CPB and ISCB for postoperative analgesia management after clavicle surgery. The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • Scheduled for clavicle surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
  • history of bleeding diathesis,
  • receiving anticoagulant treatment,
  • known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
  • infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • patients who do not accept the procedure

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Opioid consumption for postoperative 24 hours period according to the patient controlled analgesia deviceChanges from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.

The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain scores (Visual analogue scores-VAS)Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours.

Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores will be recorded

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
🇹🇷Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.