PTFE Covered Stents Versus Naked Stents in the TIPS (Transjugular Intra-hepatic Porto-systemic Shunt)
- Conditions
- Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension
- Registration Number
- NCT00593528
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Tours
- Brief Summary
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) have been increasingly used for the treatment of complications of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.
The initial experiment of the TIPS was reported during the 1990s with stents of various brands, manufacture and sizes, but all "non covered", thus owing the pseudointimal hyperplasia growing inside the stent, which progressively decreases the diameter of the shunt and thus its efficacy. Since the beginning of the 2000s, appeared stents known as "covered" by polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) designed to reduce the obstruction rate and thus the frequency shunt revisions. However, these stents are, on average, 2.5 times more expensive than the non covered stents and the cost-effectiveness ratio of the TIPS according to the type of stents used has not been assessed.
The aim of this multicentric and randomized study is to assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of these 2 principles of TIPS, the one using stents covered by PTFE, relatively expensive but seldom becoming obstructed, and the other using non covered stents, less expensive than PTFE but requiring regular gestures of redilatation.
Population concerned: Patients with a cirrhotic portal hypertension responsible for:
* recurrent variceal bleeding
* refractory ascite (or hydrothorax)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 138
-
Presence of a cirrhosis as documented by previous liverbiopsy or typical clinical signs
-
Indication validated of the TIPS (Bavéno IV), except not-controlled acute hemorrhagic :
- Recurrent variceal bleeding after failure of the usual pharmacological and endoscopic methods
- Refractory or recurrent ascites or difficult to treat
- Refractory Hydrothorax
-
Non cirrhotic HTP
-
CHILD C ≥12
-
Complete portal vein thrombosis
-
Usual contra-indication for TIPS :
- Known or suspected Hepatocarcinoma by increase of the alpha-foetoprotein >100 UI/mL associated with the presence of at least one hepatic nodule
- Cardiac insufficiency defined by a ventricular fraction of ejection < 40% with the echocardiography preliminary to the procedure
- Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAP > 40 mmHg)
- Hepatic polycystosis
- Intra-hepatic bile ducts dilatation,
- Spontaneous clinical recurrent hepatic encephalopathy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TIPS permeability rate one year Cost of the TIPS and patient care according to the type of stent used brought back to an indicator of effectiveness one year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Effectiveness criteria : survival rate - recurrence rate of the symptoms having justified the TIPS - various types of dysfunction one year Doppler : performance evaluation of Doppler for the diagnosis of dysfunction one year Tolerance criteria : frequency of early complications like early thrombosis - probability of hepatic encephalopathy occurrence and gravity one year Quality of life one year
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (12)
Chru Bordeaux
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
Chru Caen
🇫🇷Caen, France
Chru Clermont Ferrand
🇫🇷Clermont Ferrand, France
Chru Dijon
🇫🇷Dijon, France
AP-HM / La Conception
🇫🇷Marseille, France
AP-HM / La Timone
🇫🇷Marseille, France
CHRU NANTES / Hôpital Guillaume et René Laënnec
🇫🇷Nantes (st Herblain), France
CHRU NANTES / Hôtel-Dieu
🇫🇷Nantes, France
Chru Nice
🇫🇷Nice, France
Chru Poitiers
🇫🇷Poitiers, France
Scroll for more (2 remaining)Chru Bordeaux🇫🇷Bordeaux, France