MedPath

Image Supported Lead Placement in CRT

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Heart Failure
Interventions
Device: CARTBox
Registration Number
NCT05053568
Lead Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Brief Summary

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established pacemaker therapy for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure, but is hampered by a non-response rate of 30-40%. Optimising left ventricular (LV) lead placement is the cornerstone of improving treatment. The optimal location for the lead is remote from scar but within segments demonstrating late electromechanical activation. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy and clinical effect of the use of real-time guided lead placement using cardiac MRI and fluoroscopy in a blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
130
Inclusion Criteria
  • Heart failure with LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%;
  • New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV (ambulatory);
  • Optimal medical treatment that is tolerable;
  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS ≥ 130 ms, OR non-LBBB and QRS ≥ 150 ms.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Subjects with impaired renal function (severe renal insufficiency, GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2);
  • Atrial fibrillation or atrial fibrillation during MRI
  • Documented allergic reaction to gadolinium;
  • Impossibility to undergo an MRI scan;
  • Participation in another clinical study that prohibits any procedures other than standard.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention groupCARTBoxLive visualised, fluoroscopy-fused, image-guided, left ventricular lead placement on the basis of avoiding scar and targeting late mechanically activated segments.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Differences in % of patients with succesfull LV lead locationDirect post-CRT

Lead location, defined as being within, adjacent, or remote from the pre-defined target.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire6, 12 and 24 months

A quality of life questionnaire

Change in EQ-5D-5L6, 12 and 24 months

A quality of life questionnaire

Change in reverse remodelling and volumetric response6 months

Measured as the relative decrease in LV end-systolic volume, indexed to body surface area (LVESVi). Response defined as LVESVi-reduction ≥ 15%.

Health Technology Assessment24 months

The value of image-guided lead placement will be investigated in terms of healthcare expenditure revolving heart failure care. This assesment will be based on a previously conducted preliminary economic analysis.

Change in CRT response score12 months

A hierarchical clinical endpoints, combining relative LVESVi-decrease, change in New York Heart Association class, and death at 12 month follow-up.

Trial Locations

Locations (7)

Erasmus MC

🇳🇱

Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands

Amsterdam UMC

🇳🇱

Amsterdam, Netherlands

UMC Groningen

🇳🇱

Groningen, Netherlands

Maastricht UMC+

🇳🇱

Maastricht, Netherlands

St. Antonius Nieuwegein

🇳🇱

Nieuwegein, Netherlands

UMC Utrecht

🇳🇱

Utrecht, Netherlands

Isala Zwolle

🇳🇱

Zwolle, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath