MedPath

Atrial Pressure Electrophysiology Pilot Study

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Interventions
Device: ThermoCool® catheter
Device: ThermoCool® SF NAV Catheter
Registration Number
NCT01845974
Lead Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Brief Summary

This study examined data elements of hemodynamic, electrophysiologic and electrolyte trends comparing 2 different types of catheters used during a procedure to treat medication resistant atrial fibrillation-radiofrequency catheter ablation. A high flow catheter delivers a high volume of saline during the procedure. The low flow catheter delivers a low volume of saline during the procedure. The patient will be consented and randomized to one of the 2 groups using a computer generated randomization chart. Those that are put in the low flow catheter group will be considered the experimental group. All data will be collected before and after the procedure and each patient will act as their own control within each group.

Detailed Description

Final report

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
13
Inclusion Criteria
  • Drug resistant paroxysmal AF
  • ≥ 18 years old
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Left atrial thrombus on TEE
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
High Flow CatheterThermoCool® catheterThe control group will receive the higher flow catheter (ThermoCool® catheter). All data will be collected pre and post procedure therefore patients will act as their own control within each therapeutic group.
Low Flow CatheterThermoCool® SF NAV CatheterThe experimental group will receive the low flow catheter (ThermoCool® SF NAV Catheter) All data will be collected pre and post procedure therefore patients will act as their own control within each therapeutic group.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With Hemodynamic, Electrolyte, and Electrophysiologic DerangementsObservation period is up to the 24 hours post procedure

The objective of this pilot study is to investigate the use of a lower flow catheter (ThermoCool® SF NAV Catheter, Biosense Webster, Inc. Diamond Bar, CA, eluting 8-15ml/minute during RF lesion delivery) vs. a higher flow catheter (ThermoCool® catheter, same manufacturer, eluting 17-30 ml/minute), Outcomes are measured by number of Participants with Hemodynamic, Electrolyte, and Electrophysiologic Derangements, is reported. This was measured as participants requiring electrolyte replacement, if the BP dropped below 100 mm in CICU or if participants sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Advocate Lutheran General Hospital

🇺🇸

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath