MedPath

Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Completed
Conditions
Arthropathy of Knee Joint
Interventions
Procedure: Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA
Registration Number
NCT03668756
Lead Sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Brief Summary

To compare the functional outcomes of Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) and Conventional Instrumentation TKA at the 8-year follow-up.

Detailed Description

The data of the present study was collected from the review of the medical chart of the patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) TKA in one limb and conventional TKA. Then, comparing the functional outcomes of CAS and Conventional Instrumentation was performed by statistical software.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
56
Inclusion Criteria
  • The patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in one limb and conventional TKA in the other at the 8-year follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Computer-Assisted Navigation TKAComputer-Assisted Navigation TKAthe patients who were received CAS TKA in one limb
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
International Knee Society (IKS)up to 8-year follow-up

To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) QuestionnaireBaseline, 8-year follow-up

To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire

Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Baseline, 8-year follow-up

To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health SurveyBaseline, 8-year follow-up

To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire

Radiographic evaluationBaseline and 3 months after operation

Standard anteroposterior, lateral radiographs of the knee and standing long-leg radiographs of the lower extremity were obtained pre- and postoperatively. The lower extremities were fully extended so that the tibial tuberosities were facing forward and the lateral malleoli were 15 cm apart to ensure that the tibia was vertical and facing forward with minimal rotation. The X-ray beam (20-25 mA/s; 80-85 kV) was centered at the knee joint level at a distance of 120-140 cm.Radiographic data included the mechanical axis angle and the four component alignments described by Ewald: the femoral valgus (FV) angle; tibial valgus angle (TV); femoral flexion (FF) angle; and tibial flexion angle (TF)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sports Medicine Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

🇨🇳

Pizi, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath