Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Conditions
- Arthropathy of Knee Joint
- Interventions
- Procedure: Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA
- Registration Number
- NCT03668756
- Lead Sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Brief Summary
To compare the functional outcomes of Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) and Conventional Instrumentation TKA at the 8-year follow-up.
- Detailed Description
The data of the present study was collected from the review of the medical chart of the patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) TKA in one limb and conventional TKA. Then, comparing the functional outcomes of CAS and Conventional Instrumentation was performed by statistical software.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 56
- The patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in one limb and conventional TKA in the other at the 8-year follow-up.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA the patients who were received CAS TKA in one limb
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method International Knee Society (IKS) up to 8-year follow-up To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Questionnaire Baseline, 8-year follow-up To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Baseline, 8-year follow-up To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Baseline, 8-year follow-up To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
Radiographic evaluation Baseline and 3 months after operation Standard anteroposterior, lateral radiographs of the knee and standing long-leg radiographs of the lower extremity were obtained pre- and postoperatively. The lower extremities were fully extended so that the tibial tuberosities were facing forward and the lateral malleoli were 15 cm apart to ensure that the tibia was vertical and facing forward with minimal rotation. The X-ray beam (20-25 mA/s; 80-85 kV) was centered at the knee joint level at a distance of 120-140 cm.Radiographic data included the mechanical axis angle and the four component alignments described by Ewald: the femoral valgus (FV) angle; tibial valgus angle (TV); femoral flexion (FF) angle; and tibial flexion angle (TF)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sports Medicine Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Pizi, Taiwan