Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Functional Outcome of Mid-Term Follow-up Study
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Arthropathy of Knee Joint
- Sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Enrollment
- 56
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- International Knee Society (IKS)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To compare the functional outcomes of Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) and Conventional Instrumentation TKA at the 8-year follow-up.
Detailed Description
The data of the present study was collected from the review of the medical chart of the patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) TKA in one limb and conventional TKA. Then, comparing the functional outcomes of CAS and Conventional Instrumentation was performed by statistical software.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •The patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in one limb and conventional TKA in the other at the 8-year follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
International Knee Society (IKS)
Time Frame: up to 8-year follow-up
To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
Secondary Outcomes
- Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Questionnaire(Baseline, 8-year follow-up)
- Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)(Baseline, 8-year follow-up)
- Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey(Baseline, 8-year follow-up)
- Radiographic evaluation(Baseline and 3 months after operation)