MedPath

Comparison of postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device between conventional and optimizing basal infusion mode

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Not Applicable
Registration Number
KCT0002777
Lead Sponsor
Chosun University Hospital
Brief Summary

Background and objectives: The fixed-rate continuous background infusion mode with bolus dosing is a common modality for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). However, some patients suffer from inadequate analgesia or opioid-related adverse effects due to the biphasic pattern of postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PCA using an optimizing background infusion mode (OBIM) where the background injection rate varies depending on the patient’s bolus demand. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either the optimizing (group OBIM) or the traditional background infusion group (group TBIM). The numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain was evaluated at admission to and discharge from the recovery room, as well as at the 6th, 24th, and 48th postoperative hours. Data on bolus demand count, totally infused volume and background infusion rate were downloaded from the PCA device at 30-min intervals until the 48th postoperative hour. Results: The NRS score was not significantly different between groups throughout the postoperative period (p = 0.621), decreasing with time in both groups (p < 0.001). The bolus demand count was not significantly different between groups throughout (p = 0.756). The mean total cumulative infused PCA volume was lower in group OBIM (84.0 (95% confidence interval: 78.9-89.1) mL) than in group TBIM (102 (97.8-106.0) mL; p < 0.001). The total cumulative opioid dose in fentanyl equivalents, after converting sufentanil to fentanyl using an equipotential dose ratio, was lower in group OBIM (714.1 (647.4-780.9) µg) than in group TBIM (963.7 (870.5-1056.9) µg); p < 0.001). The background infusion rate was significantly different between groups throughout the study period (p < 0.001); it was higher in group OBIM than in group TBIM before the 12th postoperative hour and lower from the 18th to the 48th postoperative hour. Conclusions: The OBIM combined with bolus dosing reduces the cumulative PCA volume and opioid consumption compared to the TBIM combined with bolus dosing while yielding comparable postoperative analgesia and bolus demand in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
204
Inclusion Criteria

A. Patients scheduled to undergo surgery of the abdomen
B. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification I, II, III
C. Adult between 20 and 70 years
D. Patients who want the postoperative pain control
E. Patients who have agreed to voluntarily participate in this clinical study

Exclusion Criteria

A. Patients with neuromuscular disorders, above moderate hepatic and renal dysfunction, thyroid functional abnormality
B. Patients with severe respiratory suppression
C. Patients with allergies of medicines using study
D. Patients who are unable to understand how the use of PCA device
E. Patients who are hard to describe the degree of pain
F. Patients who are unable to listen, read and understand Korean (Including foreigners)
G. The vulnerable environment participants (pregnant women, patients who are breastfeeding, etc.)

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional Study
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
umeric Rating Score (NRS)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Presence and its cause of stop of patient-controlled analgesia device;accumulative amount of infused medicine through patient-controlled analgesia device;Type and dose of additional analgesic;Type and dose of antiemtics
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath