跳至主要内容
临床试验/KCT0002777
KCT0002777
已完成
未知

Comparison of postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device between conventional and optimizing basal infusion mode

Chosun University Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 204 人待定

概览

阶段
未知
干预措施
未指定
疾病 / 适应症
未指定
发起方
Chosun University Hospital
入组人数
204
状态
已完成
最后更新
3年前

概览

简要总结

Background and objectives: The fixed-rate continuous background infusion mode with bolus dosing is a common modality for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). However, some patients suffer from inadequate analgesia or opioid-related adverse effects due to the biphasic pattern of postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PCA using an optimizing background infusion mode (OBIM) where the background injection rate varies depending on the patient’s bolus demand. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either the optimizing (group OBIM) or the traditional background infusion group (group TBIM). The numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain was evaluated at admission to and discharge from the recovery room, as well as at the 6th, 24th, and 48th postoperative hours. Data on bolus demand count, totally infused volume and background infusion rate were downloaded from the PCA device at 30-min intervals until the 48th postoperative hour. Results: The NRS score was not significantly different between groups throughout the postoperative period (p = 0.621), decreasing with time in both groups (p < 0.001). The bolus demand count was not significantly different between groups throughout (p = 0.756). The mean total cumulative infused PCA volume was lower in group OBIM (84.0 (95% confidence interval: 78.9-89.1) mL) than in group TBIM (102 (97.8-106.0) mL; p < 0.001). The total cumulative opioid dose in fentanyl equivalents, after converting sufentanil to fentanyl using an equipotential dose ratio, was lower in group OBIM (714.1 (647.4-780.9) µg) than in group TBIM (963.7 (870.5-1056.9) µg); p < 0.001). The background infusion rate was significantly different between groups throughout the study period (p < 0.001); it was higher in group OBIM than in group TBIM before the 12th postoperative hour and lower from the 18th to the 48th postoperative hour. Conclusions: The OBIM combined with bolus dosing reduces the cumulative PCA volume and opioid consumption compared to the TBIM combined with bolus dosing while yielding comparable postoperative analgesia and bolus demand in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

注册库
who.int
开始日期
待定
结束日期
2020年2月14日
最后更新
3年前
研究类型
Interventional Study
性别
All

研究者

入排标准

入选标准

  • A. Patients scheduled to undergo surgery of the abdomen
  • B. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification I, II, III
  • C. Adult between 20 and 70 years
  • D. Patients who want the postoperative pain control
  • E. Patients who have agreed to voluntarily participate in this clinical study

排除标准

  • A. Patients with neuromuscular disorders, above moderate hepatic and renal dysfunction, thyroid functional abnormality
  • B. Patients with severe respiratory suppression
  • C. Patients with allergies of medicines using study
  • D. Patients who are unable to understand how the use of PCA device
  • E. Patients who are hard to describe the degree of pain
  • F. Patients who are unable to listen, read and understand Korean (Including foreigners)
  • G. The vulnerable environment participants (pregnant women, patients who are breastfeeding, etc.)

结局指标

主要结局

未指定

相似试验