MedPath

Study to Define Optimal IGF-1 Monitoring in Children Treated With NutropinAq

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Dwarfism
Turner Syndrome
Pituitary Diseases
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00234533
Lead Sponsor
Ipsen
Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to establish an optimal monitoring regimen in NutropinAq treated children, using newly developed capillary blood spot IGF-1 measurement technology.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
251
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children under 18 with growth failure associated with inadequate growth hormone secretion, or Turner syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children with closed epiphyses
  • Children with active neoplasm
  • Children with acute critical illness

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NutropinAq 10 mg/2 mL (30 IU)Somatropin (rDNA origin)Patients received daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of NutropinAq 10 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) for 6 months. The therapeutic daily doses administered were as follows: * GHD patients: 0.025 - 0.035 mg/ kilogram (kg) bodyweight * TS patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight * CRI patients: up to 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight Patients visited the study clinic for a baseline visit and for 2 other visits every 3 months (Weeks 12 and 24). Additional home assessments were made at Weeks 21, 22 and 23. The investigator determined the dose administered to each patient, and it was recommended to perform the injection in the evening.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) Levels Measured Using the Timed Capillary Blood Spot SamplesAt Weeks 21, 22 and 23

Fingertip capillary blood was collected using filter paper cards for the assay of capillary blood spot IGF-I in line with the monitoring recommendations of the Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) for treatment with recombinant GH therapy in children.

Capillary IGF-I assays were performed by the patient at home one day per week during Weeks 21, 22 and 23 only (same week day). The samples were scheduled in the evening prior to the injection of NutropinAq and between 7:00 and 9:00 the following morning. An extended window from 6:00 to 12:00 was allowed for defining protocol deviations.

The number of capillary blood spot IGF-I measurements and the optimal timing of samples to assess the IGF-I status of NutropinAq treated patients was assessed. IGF-I measurements for the morning and evening sampling are presented.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Weekly Timing (Weeks 21-23) and Daily Timing (Morning and Evening)At Weeks 21, 22 and 23

The influence of daily and weekly timing on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. A 3-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) was performed with patient, day and daily timing as factors after appropriate transformation to obtain normally distributed parameters. The interaction day\*time was tested and kept in the model only if p-value\<0.1. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of daily timing (Morning and Evening) and weekly timing (Week 21, Week 22 and Week 23). The values reported for Week 21, 22, and 23 represent the average IGF-I levels from the morning and evening samples at each week. The values reported for Evening represent the Evening IGF-I levels averaged across Weeks 21, 22, and 23, and similarly for the Morning values.

Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Time of Year, Calculated Age at Enrolment and Disease ConditionUp to Week 24

A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on WCV using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of the time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition on the IGF-I value were assessed.

Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of time of the year (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters), calculated age at enrolment and disease condition (GHD and TS).

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I Levels as Measured by Capillary Blood Spot Method and Serum IGF-I AssayBaseline to Week 24

3 simultaneous IGF-I measurements were taken at Weeks 0 (baseline), 12 and 24 by serum and capillary assay to determine the precision profile of the capillary blood spot method versus the serum IGF-I assay.

Change from baseline at Week 24 in the IGF-I measurements by capillary blood spot method and serum assay are presented.

Change From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 24 in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP3) MeasurementsBaseline to Week 12 and Week 24

The LWPES recommends that treatment for any indication with recombinant GH therapy in children be accompanied by regular monitoring of IGF-I and IGFBP3 concentrations. IGFBP3 binds circulating IGF-I and serum samples were taken at Visit 1 (Week 0), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24) in order to measure IGFBP3.

Change from baseline (Visit 1) at Visits 2 and 3 in IGFBP3 is presented.

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Height SDSBaseline to Week 24

The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Height SDS = (height - reference mean height (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth, therefore, a favorable outcome.

Change from baseline in the calculated height SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Calculated Weight SDSBaseline to Week 24

The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Weight SDS = (weight - reference mean weight (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in weight, therefore, a favorable outcome.

Change from baseline in the calculated weight SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Assessment of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Sex and Prepubertal StatusAt Weeks 21, 22 and 23

The influence of sex and prepubertal status on the IGF-I value as measured using the capillary blood spot method was analysed. Parameter estimates from the statistical model are presented as least squares means for the categories of sex (male and female) and prepubertal status (pubertal and prepubertal). The values reported represent average IGF-I levels as determined from the 6 measurements taken (i.e. morning and evening samples at Weeks 21, 22 and 23).

Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses to Assess Factors Affecting the Variability of IGF-I Levels: Categorised by Disease Condition and LocationUp to Week 24

A multivariate linear regression analysis of factors on within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) using a stepwise forward-backward elimination was used to determine the effect of individual factors on IGF-I values as measured using the capillary blood spot method (p=0.15 for a variable to enter and remain in the model). The WCV was computed from the series of 6 measurements (2 samplings in each of Weeks 21, 22 and 23). The influence of disease condition and country clusters on the IGF-I value were assessed.

Country clusters: cluster 1: France; cluster 2: Spain, Greece, Romania and Italy; cluster 3: UK, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, Austria and Finland ; cluster 4: Russia ; cluster 5: Ukraine.

Parameter estimates from the statistical model presented as least squares means for categories of disease condition (GHD and TS) and location (Clusters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) are presented.

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter HeightBaseline to Week 24

The auxological parameter, height, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).

Change from baseline in measured height at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter WeightBaseline to Week 24

The auxological parameter, weight, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).

Change from baseline in measured weight at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Extent of Exposure to NutropinAq Throughout the StudyUp to Week 24

The extent of treatment exposure throughout the study is presented as the mean number of daily injections performed.

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth VelocityBaseline to Week 24

The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24).

Change from baseline in the measured annualised growth velocity at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Percentage of Patients Rating the Overall Handling of the Administration Device, NutropinAq Pen, to Assess the Acceptability and Tolerance of NutropinAq and Its PenAt Month 5

The acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire at Month 5. The users (parents and/or child) of NutropinAq pen and compliance aid booklet were asked to describe and rate the pen, cartridge, compliance aid booklet and their ease of use.

The percentage of patients responding to each category for the assessment of the overall handling of the NutropinAq pen are presented. The categories are: Very easy, Easy, Moderately difficult, Difficult, Very difficult and Missing.

Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Auxological Parameter Annualised Growth Velocity SDSBaseline to Week 24

The auxological parameter, annualised growth velocity, was measured at Visit 1 (Baseline measurement), Visit 2 (Week 12) and Visit 3 (Week 24). The French growth charts were used for the calculation of SDS parameters: the charts provide for each age range and sex a mean parameter and SD value, from which the SDS parameter can be derived assuming a normal distribution. For example: Annualised GV SDS = (annualised GV - reference mean annualised GV (age, sex)) / reference SD (age, sex). The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A positive change in SDS indicates an improvement in growth velocity, therefore, a favorable outcome.

Change from baseline in the annualised growth velocity SDS at Visit 3 (Week 24) for the overall ITT population is presented.

Posology of NutropinAq at Baseline (Visit 1) Summarised as Mean DoseVisit 1 (Baseline)

It was intended that the posology (mg/kg/day) of NutropinAq would remain constant throughout the study. The mean posology adopted at Visit 1 is presented.

Trial Locations

Locations (42)

Dienst Kindergeneeskunde

🇧🇪

Edegem, Belgium

University Hospital Wales

🇬🇧

Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom

Centre Hospitalier General

🇫🇷

Le Havre, France

CHU de Montpellier

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

Helsinki University Central Hospital

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

CHU - Hôtel Dieu

🇫🇷

Angers, France

Hôpital Archet 2

🇫🇷

Nice, France

Cabinet Médical

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

CHU Grenoble

🇫🇷

Grenoble, France

CHU Timone Enfants

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Groupe Hospitalier de Necker

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre

🇫🇷

Tarbes, France

Centre Pédiatrique Gatien de Clocheville

🇫🇷

Tours, France

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Germany

Hospital Gregorio Marañón

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hospital Clínico Universitario

🇪🇸

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen

🇩🇪

Tübingen, Germany

General State Hospital of Nikaia

🇬🇷

Athens, Greece

PA Kyriakou Children's Hospital

🇬🇷

Athens, Greece

Azienda Policlinico - Università di Catania

🇮🇹

Catania, Italy

Il Università degli Studi di Napoli

🇮🇹

Napoli, Italy

Institutul de Endocrinologie C.I. Parhon

🇷🇴

Bucuresti, Romania

Clinica Pediatrica, Universita Federico II di Napoli

🇮🇹

Napoli, Italy

Endocrinology Research Centre RAMS, Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Tushino Pediatric Hospital, RMAPE Department of Endocrinology for Childhood and Adolescent Age

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Clinica Pediatrica

🇮🇹

Parma, Italy

Il Detska Klinika

🇸🇰

Bratislava, Slovakia

Hospital de Nens de Barcelona

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hospital General Universitario

🇪🇸

Elche, Spain

Hospital Parc Taulí

🇪🇸

Sabadell, Spain

Scientific-Research Institute of Endocrinology, Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine

🇺🇦

Kiev, Ukraine

Ukrainian Scientific practical Centre of Endocrine surgery, Endocrine Organs and Tissues Transplantation

🇺🇦

Kiev, Ukraine

Ospedale Policlinico

🇮🇹

Chieti, Italy

Clinica Pediatrica II

🇮🇹

Firenze, Italy

Hôpital Charles Nicolle

🇫🇷

Rouen, France

CHU Hautepierre

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Hôpital des Enfants

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

Aalborg Sygehus Nord, Borneafdelingen

🇩🇰

Aalborg, Denmark

Klinika Deti a Dorostu

🇨🇿

Praha, Czechia

Sygeh. i Ringkjobing Amt, Borneafdeling

🇩🇰

Herning, Denmark

St George's Hospital

🇬🇧

London, England, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath