MedPath

Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Moderately Difficult to Intubate
Registration Number
NCT01814176
Lead Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Brief Summary

During Anesthesia many patients require that a breathing be inserted into their windpipe. This is usually achieved using a direct laryngoscope, consisting of a retraction blade with a light near its end. When achieving a direct line-of-sight to the windpipe is difficult, more force is often applied, resulting in greater patient stress. A GlideScope video laryngoscope uses a camera and light source to see the windpipe. This enables the user to see objects that may not be in the direct line-of-sight. This likely results in less force being required, reducing patient stress. Because such stresses are often confounded by patient variables, we are comparing the forces required by the direct and video laryngoscopes on patients with at least one risk factor for difficulty, by directly measuring these with special sensors attached to the laryngoscope blades.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
44
Inclusion Criteria
  • age > 18years
  • elective surgery
  • single lumen endotracheal intubation required
  • signed informed consent
  • one risk factor for a difficult laryngoscopy ( Mallampati score >3, inter-incisor gap < 3.5cm, thyromental distance < 6.5cm, sternomental distance < 12.5cm, reduced neck extension and flexion)
Exclusion Criteria
  • lack of patient consent
  • anesthesiologist declines to consent
  • contraindication to neuromuscular blockade
  • ASA 4
  • rapid sequence intubation
  • previous failed intubation
  • other method of intubation indicated eg fiberoptic intubation, awake tracheostomy
  • symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux
  • cervical spine instability
  • unstable hypertension and symptomatic coronary artery disease
  • cerebrovascular disease or raised intracranial pressure
  • oral/pharyngeal/laryngeal carcinoma
  • loose teeth/poor dentition

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peak forces during intubationIntraoperatively

Peak forces generated during the laryngoscopy and intubation process using both laryngoscopes.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Toronto General Hospital

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Toronto General Hospital
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.