Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02309658
NCT02309658
Completed
Phase 2

Safety and Efficacy of Gemcitabine Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients and Association With Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (hENT1) Expression

Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentSeptember 2013

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
cisplatin
Conditions
Cancer of Cervix
Sponsor
Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Toxicity will be evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4,0).
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The propose of this study is to determine if neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is safe and effective in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. Moreover, the study would determine if there is any association between hENT1 expression and response rate to gemcitabine.

Detailed Description

The study has been developed and executed at Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira Institute - IMIP since September/2013. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based in gemcitabine followed by chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients. Data has been collected at medical oncology clinic, where patients have medical visits and receive chemotherapy treatment. New cases of cervical cancer patients are analysed for eligibility criteria. When matching these criteria, the protocol is explained, its participation is offered and consent form is explained, highlighting the voluntary aspect of the process. If there is agreement in participation, two consent forms are provided and signed. Patients receive one copy and the other one goes to his/her medical record. All demographic, social and medical data is recorded. Patients are considered to have the first visit on the day they sign consent agreement form, when they are also referred to radiooncologist visit. Up to 30-business days they should complete staging (MRI, PET-SCAN, labs) and initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Before each day, of each cycle, patients are seen by medical oncologist and nurse, when toxicity data is collected. Before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, there is a clinical evaluation performed by the gynecologic oncologist to evaluate clinical response. During chemoradiation, patients have weekly visits. The treatment is completed with brachytherapy, and 30-days after its completion, another clinical evaluation is done. After 90 days of completion treatment, pelvic MRI and PET-SCAN are repeated and considered to determine response rate. Biopsies samples have been collected. The investigators intend to perform immunohistochemical analysis at the end of recruitment and identify any association between hENT1 expression and outcomes. Information is collected by principal investigator in EXCEL forms, during medical visits. Toxicity data has been analyzed every 3 months by a data monitoring committee comprising two medical oncologists, one radiooncologist and a gynecological nurse. All unexpected event is related to this committee and also to the Research Ethics Committee of IMIP. Patients are followed up 3/3 months. Inconsistent or missing data will be re-checked in medical records. This is a phase IIa study with only one arm of intervention. Since response rates observed in phase III studies with concomitant platin based chemoradiation is 85% in average, and given that response rate using gemcitabin based adjuvant chemotherapy, after chemoradiation, is 96.5%, the investigators calculated the sample size of 49 patients. It was considered an alpha error of 5% and 80% power. Descriptive analyses of variables of this population will be held. The normal numerical variables are described as mean +/- standard deviation. The non-parametric numeric variables are described as median (interquartile range). Categorical data will be described as a percentage of the total. The progression free survival and overall survival will be obtained by Kaplan-Meier method, using the computer program Epinfo.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2013
End Date
October 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
Female

Investigators

Sponsor
Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Carla Rameri Alexandre Silva de Azevedo

MD, Medical Oncologist

Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histological confirmed diagnostic of cervical carcinoma
  • International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage Ib2 (\>4cm) to IVa
  • Performance status 0-2 (ECOG scale)
  • Hemoglobin \>10g/dl , neutrophil \> 1500 /mm3, platelet \>100.000/mm3
  • Creatinine \< 1,5 mg/dl
  • Bilirubin total \<1,6 mg/dl and liver enzymes (AST e ALT) \< 2x (upper limit of normal)
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cervical tumors with adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous and small cell adenocarcinoma histology
  • Distant metastasis including paraortic nodes
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding
  • Previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy or uterine surgery
  • Relevant co-morbidity which prevent chemotherapy use
  • Previous neoplasia, except non-melanoma skin cancer

Arms & Interventions

Interventional

Treatment consisted of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m2 administered on day 1 and 8, for two cycles. After that, weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 is administered concomitant with radiotherapy (45-55Gy) in 1,8-2,0 daily fractions and a 10Gy boost when there was parametrial involvement. Low-dose rate brachytherapy, in 4 fractions of 7Gy, in a total of 28Gy will complete the protocol.

Intervention: cisplatin

Interventional

Treatment consisted of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m2 administered on day 1 and 8, for two cycles. After that, weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 is administered concomitant with radiotherapy (45-55Gy) in 1,8-2,0 daily fractions and a 10Gy boost when there was parametrial involvement. Low-dose rate brachytherapy, in 4 fractions of 7Gy, in a total of 28Gy will complete the protocol.

Intervention: gemcitabine

Interventional

Treatment consisted of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m2 administered on day 1 and 8, for two cycles. After that, weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2 is administered concomitant with radiotherapy (45-55Gy) in 1,8-2,0 daily fractions and a 10Gy boost when there was parametrial involvement. Low-dose rate brachytherapy, in 4 fractions of 7Gy, in a total of 28Gy will complete the protocol.

Intervention: chemoradiation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Toxicity will be evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4,0).

Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks after brachytherapy

Toxicity will be recorded before each day of chemotherapy and weekly during radiotherapy.

Response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria with pelvic MRI and PET-CT)

Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment

Response will be evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria with pelvic MRI and PET-CT. Immediately after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 30 days after brachytherapy, clinical response will also be evaluated.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Disease free survival(One year of follow up.)
  • Overall Survival(One year of follow up.)
  • hENT1 expression(At the end of recruitment, expected to be at 24 months after study beginning)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials