PROPPER Prospective Registry of Outcomes With Penile Prosthesis
- Conditions
- Erectile DysfunctionImpotence
- Interventions
- Device: AMS Penile Prosthesis Devices
- Registration Number
- NCT01383018
- Lead Sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this observational registry is to collect and better understand "real-world" outcomes for men undergoing penile implant surgery to treat erectile dysfunction.
- Detailed Description
A prospective, multi-center, observational registry to be conducted at multiple sites throughout the United States and Canada, to collect "real-world" penile prosthetic outcomes according to investigators' standard of care. Using questionnaires as well as electronic data collection, investigating physicians will prospectively measure patient responses at regular intervals over a one- to five year period. The physician researchers have identified key metrics for the study including effectiveness, durability, complications, and patient satisfaction; quality of life will also be analyzed, being defined through several validated patient surveys.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 1457
Men diagnosed with erectile dysfunction (ED) for whom an AMS penile prosthesis is recommended by their physician are eligible for inclusion. Potentially eligible men should also meet the following inclusion criteria for study enrollment:
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to enrollment (if applicable).
- Willing to be seen or contacted by phone by the investigator and answer at least 2 questions related to satisfaction and device use 1 year following implantation of an AMS penile prosthesis.
- Men who are deemed by their physician to be not suitable for a penile implant will be excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AMS penile prosthesis receipients AMS Penile Prosthesis Devices Men for whom an AMS penile prosthesis is recommended
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Penile Prosthesis That Were Not Using the Device, Reasons for Non-use 1 year, post implantation Penile prosthesis reasons for non-use at 1 year (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
Number of Participants With Penile Prosthesis That Are Using the Device 1 year, post implantation Number of subjects using penile prosthesis at 1 year (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
Number of Participants With Penile Prosthesis That Are Using the Device Less Than Desired or Dissatisfied - Reason Device Used Less Than Desired or Dissatisfied 1 year, post implantation Reason why subject is using penile prosthesis less than desired or dissatisfied (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
Number of Participants With Penile Prosthesis Overall Subject Satisfaction 1 year, post-implantation Penile prosthesis overall subject satisfaction (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
Number of Participants With Penile Prosthesis That Are Using the Device Indicating How Often Their Use is. 1 year, post implantation Penile prosthesis use at year (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
Number of Times Per Month Participants With Penile Prosthesis Are Using the Device. 1 year, post implantation Penile prosthesis use at 1 year measured in number of times per month (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
Number of Participants With Penile Prosthesis Using the Device But Not as Often as Desired 1 year, post implantation Number of penile prosthesis subjects using the device but indicated that they were not using as often as desired (effectiveness objective 1) measured using a non-validated, standard question, evaluated overall and by penile prosthesis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (11)
Lahey Clinic
🇺🇸Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
El Camino Urology Medical Group
🇺🇸Mountain View, California, United States
SIU School of Medicine
🇺🇸Springfield, Illinois, United States
Urology Centers of Alabama
🇺🇸Homewood, Alabama, United States
Kaiser Permanente
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Ark-LA-Tek
🇺🇸Bossier City, Louisiana, United States
The Urology Team
🇺🇸Austin, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Urology San Antonio Research, PA
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Utah
🇺🇸Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
University of Ottawa
🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada