Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Tablet Regimen of Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Compared With a Single Tablet Regimen of Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults

Phase 3

Completed

Conditions: HIV-1 Infection

Interventions: Drug: FTC/RPV/TDF
Drug: EFV/FTC/TDF

Registration Number: NCT01309243

Lead Sponsor: Gilead Sciences

Brief Summary: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the emtricitabine (FTC)/rilpivirine (RPV)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) single-tablet regimen (STR) compared with the efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF STR in HIV-1 infected adults who had not previously received treatment with antiretroviral medications.

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the study treatments. Randomization was stratified by HIV-1 RNA level (≤ 100,000 copies/mL or \> 100,000 copies/mL) at screening. A treatment duration of 96 weeks was planned, with the option for subjects in FTC/RPV/TDF STR arm to receive treatment following the Week 96 visit until FTC/RPV/TDF STR is commercially available or until Gilead Sciences elects to terminate development in that country.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 799

Inclusion Criteria

Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form
Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels ≥ 2,500 copies/mL at screening
No prior use of any approved or experimental anti-HIV drug for any length of time
Screening genotype report showing sensitivity to EFV, FTC, TDF, and lack of the RPV mutations K101E/P, E138A/G/K/Q/R, Y181C/I/V, and H221Y
Normal ECG
Hepatic transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) ≤ 5 x the upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL, or normal direct bilirubin
Adequate hematologic function
Serum amylase ≤ 5 x ULN (participants with serum amylase > 5 x ULN remained eligible if serum lipase was ≤ 5 x ULN)
Adequate renal function
Males and Females of childbearing potential must have agreed to utilize highly effective contraception methods (two separate forms of contraception, one of which must be an effective barrier method, or be non-heterosexually active, practice sexual abstinence or have a vasectomized partner) from screening throughout the duration of study period and for 12 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
Adult (≥ 18 years) males or non-pregnant females

Exclusion Criteria

A new AIDS-defining condition diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening
Females who were breastfeeding
Positive serum pregnancy test (female of childbearing potential)
Proven or suspected acute hepatitis in the 30 days prior to study entry
Subjects receiving drug treatment for hepatitis C, or subjects who were anticipated to receive treatment for hepatitis C during the course of the study
Subjects experiencing decompensated cirrhosis
Had an implanted defibrillator or pacemaker
Current alcohol or substance abuse
A history of malignancy within the past 5 years or ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous carcinoma
Active, serious infections requiring parenteral antibiotic or antifungal therapy within 30 days prior to baseline
Receiving ongoing therapy or anticipated to need to initiate drugs or herbal/natural supplements during the study that are contraindicated or not recommended for use, including drugs not to be used with FTC, EFV, RPV, or TDF; or subjects with known allergies to the excipients of the FTC/RPV/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF single-tablet regimens
Participation in any other clinical trial without prior approval from the sponsor was prohibited while participating in this trial.
Had been treated with immunosuppressant therapies or chemotherapeutic agents within 3 months of study screening, or expected to receive these agents or systemic steroids for immunosuppression during the study (eg, corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, and other immune-based or cytokine-based therapies)
Had any other clinical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would have made the participant unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with the dosing requirements

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
FTC/RPV/TDF	FTC/RPV/TDF	-
EFV/FTC/TDF	EFV/FTC/TDF	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48	Week 48	The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the US FDA snapshot algorithm. The snapshot algorithm defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 48	Baseline to Week 48
Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through Week 96, Participants With Viral Resistance	Baseline to Week 96	Resistance Analysis Set: participants with either suboptimal virologic response or virologic rebound were considered to have virologic failure and were analyzed. Suboptimal virologic response was assessed at Week 8 and was defined as having HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL and \< 1-log10 reduction from baseline at the Week 8 visit, which was confirmed at the subsequent visit. Virologic rebound was defined as having 2 consecutive visits with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL after achieving HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL, or as having 2 consecutive visits with \> 1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from their nadir. In addition, subjects who were on study drugs, had not been analyzed previously, and who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, Week 96, or their last visit (at or after Week 8) were also analyzed for resistance at their last visit. Subsequent to the first resistance testing, subjects experiencing repeated confirmed virologic failure were assessed for resistance retesting on a case-by-case basis.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 48	Baseline to Week 48
Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through Week 96, All Participants	Baseline to Week 96	Participants who experienced either suboptimal virologic response or virologic rebound were considered to have virologic failure and were analyzed for resistance. Suboptimal virologic response was assessed at Week 8 and was defined as having HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL and \< 1-log10 reduction from baseline at the Week 8 visit, which was confirmed at the subsequent visit. Virologic rebound was defined as having 2 consecutive visits with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL after achieving HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL, or as having 2 consecutive visits with \> 1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from their nadir. In addition, subjects who were on study drugs, had not been analyzed previously, and who had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, Week 96, or their last visit (at or after Week 8) were also analyzed for resistance at their last visit. Subsequent to the first resistance testing, subjects experiencing repeated confirmed virologic failure were assessed for resistance retesting on a case-by-case basis.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 48	Baseline to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96	Baseline to Week 96	The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the US FDA snapshot algorithm.
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48	Baseline to Week 48
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96	Baseline to Week 96
Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 48	Baseline to Week 48

Trial Locations

Locations (150): University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Spectrum Medical Group
🇺🇸
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
AHF Research Center
🇺🇸
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Living Hope Education and Research Consultants
🇺🇸
Long Beach, California, United States
Jeffrey Goodman Special Care Clinic/Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Lightsource Medical
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Oasis Clinic
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Anthony Mills MD Inc
🇺🇸
Los Angeles, California, United States
Scroll for more (140 remaining)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States