Comparison between Flapless and Open flap technique for Implant placement
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/10/058921
- Lead Sponsor
- Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.ASA Grade I,II patients
2.Patient with bilateral missing mandibular molars.
3.Patient age between 18-40 years
4,Good oral hygiene
5.Adequate bone volume for implant placement
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patient with complicated medical history such as uncontrolled diabetes, bleeding disorders, osteoporosis; patients on radiation therapy; and immunocompromised states.
2. Untreated periodontitis
3. Smokers
•Patients with parafunctional habits.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The possible outcome of this study will be to see the lesser reduction in crestal bone height, better peri-implant health and would healing using flapless technique than open flap technique for implant placementTimepoint: At baseline,1st day, 3rd day, 5th day, 7th day, 4 months and 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Successful dental implant surgery providing patients with teeth in missing dental segments with; decreased surgical time; improved patient comfort; & accelerated recuperation, allowing the patient to resume normal oral hygiene procedures immediately after the procedureTimepoint: at baseline, 1st day, 3rd day, 5th day, 7th day, 4 months & 6 months