Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT01826565
NCT01826565UnknownNot Applicable

Comparison of Two Insertion Technique of I-gel: Standard Versus 90-degree Rotation

Seoul National University Hospital0 sites100 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2013Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
100
Primary Endpoint
The success rate of insertion
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaArms & InterventionsOutcomesInvestigatorsRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy of rotational technique in the insertion of i-gel

Detailed Description

The i-gel is one of the 2nd generation supraglottic airways. The rotational technique is known to increase the success rate of insertion of other supraglottic airways. The investigators try to evaluate the efficacy of rotational technique in the insertion of i-gel.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients scheduled for general anesthesia(transurethral resection of bladder tumor or transurethral resection of the prostate) using i-gelTM

Exclusion Criteria

  • •History of recent postoperative sore throat
  • •History of difficult airway
  • •Mouth opening < 2.5 cm
  • •Emergency operation

Arms & Interventions

Rotation

Experimental

Rotational technique applied

Intervention: Rotational technique (Procedure)

Control

No Intervention

i-gel will be inserted without rotation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The success rate of insertion

Time Frame: up to 30 min.

check oropharyngeal leakage at pressure 12 cmH2O

Secondary Outcomes

  • postoperative sore throat(up to 2 days)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Unknown
A clinical trial to compare two different techniques of i gel insertion i.e simple and rotational technique in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries
CTRI/2024/04/065115Inayat garg
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Ease of I-gel Insertion With Two Different Techniques in AdultsAirway Morbidity
NCT04109898Aga Khan University114
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
A comparison of ease of i-gel insertion using injection Dexmedetomidine-Propofol intravenously versus injection Fentanyl-Propofol intravenously.
CTRI/2024/01/061400Tata motors hospital
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
This study evaluates the effectiveness of three insertion methods of supraglottic airway device= I -Gel in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia (GA). This would help the anesthesiologist choose best technique for airway management.
CTRI/2024/06/069570I
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing the insertion of supra glottic airway i-gel by anaesthesia trainees with or without the help of consultant anaesthesiologists under supervision in an academic hospital
CTRI/2021/08/035985DR SINDUJA S36