Comparison of the results of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in an Indian context. When compared to follicular phase stimulation alone, can luteal phase stimulation maximize results?
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: Z314- Encounter for procreative investigation and testing
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/08/056183
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Aruna Rajan
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Poseidon 3 and 4 category (AFC <5 OR AMH <1.2).
History of Previous Poor response ( < 9 oocytes or Previous IVF cycles less than 2 good quality blastocyst).
If the Number of blastocyst formed is less than or equal to 2 in follicular phase stimulation in Normal responders.
Patient insisting on Luteal phase Stimulation.
Exclusion Criteria
SOAT.
Genetic Abnormalities.
More than 4 good quality blastocyst formed in Follicular phase Stimulation though inclusion criteria satisfied.
Patients not willing for Luteal Phase Stimulation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method M2 rate , Stimulation & ICSI cancellation rate, <br/ ><br>Fertilization rate , cleavage rate, Blastocyst rate, Good Blastocyst rate <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1 week after FPS stimulation <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ot applicableTimepoint: Not applicable